• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基因时代的保险承保。

Insurance underwriting in the genetic era.

作者信息

Pokorski R J

机构信息

Swiss Re, Fairfield, CT 06430-3544, USA.

出版信息

Am J Hum Genet. 1997 Jan;60(1):205-16.

PMID:8981964
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1712568/
Abstract

Genetic technology is assuming a greater role in the practice of medicine. Insurers have a vested interest because individually underwritten insurance cannot be sold without risk classification, and much of the medical information needed to classify risks will have a genetic component. This paper reviews recent genetic advances and their potential impact on life, disability income, long-term care, and critical illness insurance. Alzheimer disease is chosen to illustrate the effect of an organized effort to withhold medical information from insurance companies. Consumers will not support a private insurance mechanism with extensive cross-subsidization among policyholders and where medical information becomes inviolate simply because it is genetic. A framework for deliberations with the medical community is proposed.

摘要

基因技术在医学实践中发挥着越来越重要的作用。保险公司对此有着既得利益,因为没有风险分类就无法销售个人承保保险,而进行风险分类所需的许多医疗信息都将包含基因成分。本文回顾了近期的基因进展及其对人寿、残疾收入、长期护理和重大疾病保险的潜在影响。选择阿尔茨海默病来说明有组织地向保险公司隐瞒医疗信息所产生的影响。消费者不会支持一种在投保人之间存在广泛交叉补贴且医疗信息仅仅因为是基因信息就变得不可侵犯的私人保险机制。本文提出了一个与医学界进行商讨的框架。

相似文献

1
Insurance underwriting in the genetic era.基因时代的保险承保。
Am J Hum Genet. 1997 Jan;60(1):205-16.
2
Medical Underwriting In Long-Term Care Insurance: Market Conditions Limit Options For Higher-Risk Consumers.长期护理保险中的医疗核保:市场状况限制了高风险消费者的选择。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Aug 1;35(8):1494-503. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1133.
3
Making the normal deviant: the introduction of predictive medicine in life insurance.
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Sep;63(5):1225-35. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.03.029. Epub 2006 May 12.
4
Genetic testing and insurance. The Ad Hoc Committee on Genetic Testing/Insurance Issues.基因检测与保险。基因检测/保险问题特别委员会。
Am J Hum Genet. 1995 Jan;56(1):327-31.
5
Costs, commitment and locality: a comparison of for-profit and not-for-profit health plans.成本、承诺与地区性:营利性与非营利性健康保险计划的比较
Inquiry. 2004 Summer;41(2):116-29. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_41.2.116.
6
The use of genetic tests and genetic information by life insurance companies: does this differ from the use of routine medical information?人寿保险公司对基因检测和基因信息的使用:这与常规医疗信息的使用有何不同?
Genet Test. 1998;2(1):3-8. doi: 10.1089/gte.1998.2.3.
7
Genetic testing and genetic discrimination: Public policy when insurance becomes "too expensive".遗传检测与遗传歧视:当保险变得“过于昂贵”时的公共政策
J Health Econ. 2021 May;77:102441. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2021.102441. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
8
Insurability for asymptomatic hematuria or proteinuria during childhood.
Am J Kidney Dis. 1993 Aug;22(2):261-3. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(12)70315-3.
9
Insurability and the HIV epidemic: ethical issues in underwriting.可保性与艾滋病流行:保险核保中的伦理问题
Milbank Q. 1990;68(4):497-525.
10
Investigating genetic discrimination in the Australian life insurance sector: the use of genetic test results in underwriting, 1999-2003.澳大利亚人寿保险行业的基因歧视调查:1999 - 2003年基因检测结果在承保中的应用
J Law Med. 2007 Feb;14(3):367-96.

引用本文的文献

1
GINA, genism, and civil rights.《吉娜法案》、基因歧视与民权
Bioethics. 2008 Aug;22(7):ii-iv. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00693.x.
2
Genetic testing for Alzheimer's disease and its impact on insurance purchasing behavior.阿尔茨海默病的基因检测及其对保险购买行为的影响。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Mar-Apr;24(2):483-90. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.2.483.
3
Laws restricting health insurers' use of genetic information: impact on genetic discrimination.限制健康保险公司使用基因信息的法律:对基因歧视的影响。
Am J Hum Genet. 2000 Jan;66(1):293-307. doi: 10.1086/302714.

本文引用的文献

1
Individual, family, and societal dimensions of genetic discrimination: a case study analysis.基因歧视的个人、家庭和社会层面:一项案例研究分析
Sci Eng Ethics. 1996 Jan;2(1):71-88. doi: 10.1007/BF02639319.
2
Genetic tests: can we afford the answers?
Med World News. 1991 Jan;32(1):32-7.
3
Emotional and behavioral responses to genetic testing for susceptibility to cancer.对癌症易感性基因检测的情绪和行为反应。
Oncology (Williston Park). 1996 Feb;10(2):191-5, 9; discussion 200-2.
4
Polymerase chain reaction in the detection of micrometastases and circulating tumor cells.聚合酶链反应在微转移和循环肿瘤细胞检测中的应用
Cancer. 1996 Jul 1;78(1):10-6. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960701)78:1<10::AID-CNCR3>3.0.CO;2-L.
5
Looking forward in diagnostic pathology: the molecular superhighway.
Cancer. 1996 Jul 1;78(1):1-3. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960701)78:1<1::AID-CNCR1>3.0.CO;2-S.
6
Vital data.
Sci Am. 1996 Mar;274(3):100-5. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0396-100.
7
Pathologists enter debate on consent for genetic research on stored tissue.
JAMA. 1996 Feb 21;275(7):503-4.
8
Molecular epidemiology: insights into cancer susceptibility, risk assessment, and prevention.分子流行病学:对癌症易感性、风险评估及预防的见解
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996 Apr 17;88(8):496-509. doi: 10.1093/jnci/88.8.496.
9
Russian and US researchers develop 'biochips' for faster, inexpensive biomedical tests.
JAMA. 1996 Feb 28;275(8):581-2.
10
Age-associated memory impairment and Alzheimer's disease.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1996 Feb;44(2):209-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1996.tb02443.x.