Schnabel K, Hermann H J, Kuttig H
Strahlentherapie. 1977 Aug;153(8):553-6.
A comparative examination of three Alderson phantoms by means of radiograms and computer tomograms shows that there are significant differences between the individual phantoms. Phantom I, for example, is inferior to phantom II because of the bad insertion of the bones into the surrounding plastic material (covered by air bubbles) and the inclusions of air in the soft parts. All phantoms have a rather strong osteoporosis of the skeleton which is most probably due to the production method [1,2]. Furthermore, the average absorption coefficients of the soft tissues show remarkable differences from one phantom to another.
通过射线照片和计算机断层扫描对三个奥尔登森人体模型进行的对比检查表明,各个模型之间存在显著差异。例如,模型I不如模型II,因为骨头插入周围塑料材料的情况不佳(被气泡覆盖)以及软组织中有空气夹杂。所有模型的骨骼都有相当严重的骨质疏松,这很可能归因于生产方法[1,2]。此外,不同模型之间软组织的平均吸收系数也存在显著差异。