• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Efficacy of ramipril versus enalapril in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.

作者信息

Yasky J, Verho M, Erasmus T P, Luus H G, Angela M, Grandin L, Akbary M A, Rangoonwala B

机构信息

Departamento de Medicina Interna, Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, Mendoza, Argentina.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pract. 1996 Sep;50(6):302-10.

PMID:8983318
Abstract

This double-blind, randomised, cross-over study investigated the antihypertensive efficacy of ramipril and enalapril was completed by 30 patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. After a four-week placebo run-in phase, the patients received either 2.5mg ramipril or 10mg enalapril once daily for four weeks. The dosages were increased to 5mg ramipril and 20mg enalapril for a further four weeks. After a placebo washout phase of four weeks, the patients were crossed over to the alternative treatment. The decrease in average 24-hour ambulatory diastolic blood pressure from week 0 to week 8 was 1.6mmHg greater with ramipril than enalapril (90% confidence interval 0.6-2.7mmHg). The corresponding reduction in for systolic blood pressure was also greater with ramipril than enalapril by 2.4mmHg (90% confidence interval: 0.5-4.2mmHg). For the difference in the drop of 24-hour ambulatory diastolic blood pressure between ramipril and enalapril the lower level of the 90% confidence interval (CI) is above the clinically relevant difference of -3mmHg. This is an indication that ramipril (2.5 and 5mg dose) is at least as effective as enalapril (10 and 20mg dose) in decreasing blood pressure in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. The duration of adequate antihypertensive effect was relatively long for both ramipril and enalapril; however, ramipril tended to have a more prolonged antihypertensive effect. Ramipril had a higher diastolic and systolic trough/peak ratio than enalapril, resulting in a more uniform antihypertensive effect over the 24-hour treatment period. Both ramipril and enalapril were well tolerated and the two treatment groups had similar safety profiles.

摘要

相似文献

1
Efficacy of ramipril versus enalapril in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.
Br J Clin Pract. 1996 Sep;50(6):302-10.
2
Comparison of ramipril and enalapril in patients with essential hypertension.雷米普利与依那普利治疗原发性高血压患者的比较。
Pharmacotherapy. 1993 May-Jun;13(3):224-8.
3
An 18-week, prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of amlodipine/ramipril combination versus amlodipine monotherapy in the treatment of hypertension: the assessment of combination therapy of amlodipine/ramipril (ATAR) study.氨氯地平/雷米普利联合用药与氨氯地平单药治疗高血压的18周前瞻性随机双盲多中心研究:氨氯地平/雷米普利联合治疗评估(ATAR)研究
Clin Ther. 2008 Sep;30(9):1618-28. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.09.008.
4
Quinapril versus enalapril in the treatment of mild-to-moderate essential hypertension.
Clin Ther. 1991 Sep-Oct;13(5):651-5.
5
Comparative efficacy and safety of aliskiren, an oral direct renin inhibitor, and ramipril in hypertension: a 6-month, randomized, double-blind trial.口服直接肾素抑制剂阿利吉仑与雷米普利治疗高血压的疗效和安全性比较:一项为期6个月的随机双盲试验。
J Hypertens. 2008 Mar;26(3):589-99. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3282f3ad9a.
6
Ambulatory blood pressure-lowering effects of valsartan and enalapril after a missed dose in previously untreated patients with hypertension: a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end-point trial.缬沙坦和依那普利对既往未治疗的高血压患者漏服一剂药物后的动态血压降低作用:一项前瞻性、随机、开放标签、盲法终点试验。
Clin Ther. 2008 Jan;30(1):108-20. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.01.012.
7
Efficacy and tolerability of two formulations of ramipril in Korean adults with mild to moderate essential hypertension: an 8-week, multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-group noninferiority trial.雷米普利两种制剂对韩国轻至中度原发性高血压成人患者的疗效和耐受性:一项为期8周的多中心、前瞻性、随机、开放标签、平行组非劣效性试验。
Clin Ther. 2009 May;31(5):988-98. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.05.020.
8
Comparison of the antihypertensive effects of the fixed dose combination enalapril 10 mg/nitrendipine 20 mg vs losartan 50 mg/hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg, assessed by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, in essential hypertensive patients.通过24小时动态血压监测评估依那普利10毫克/尼群地平20毫克固定剂量复方制剂与氯沙坦50毫克/氢氯噻嗪12.5毫克对原发性高血压患者的降压效果比较。
J Hum Hypertens. 2004 Mar;18(3):215-22. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001655.
9
Comparative efficacy of perindopril and enalapril once daily using 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.
Int J Clin Pract. 1999 Jun;53(4):277-80.
10
Effect of sitagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, on blood pressure in nondiabetic patients with mild to moderate hypertension.二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂西他列汀对非糖尿病轻至中度高血压患者血压的影响。
J Clin Pharmacol. 2008 May;48(5):592-8. doi: 10.1177/0091270008316885. Epub 2008 Mar 19.

引用本文的文献

1
High-Throughput Screening for Prescribing Cascades Among Real-World Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor Initiators.对现实世界中血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂起始使用者的处方级联进行高通量筛选。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2025 Mar;34(3):e70132. doi: 10.1002/pds.70132.
2
Is Sacubitril/Valsartan a Superior Agent in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction? A Review of Randomized Comparative Trials.沙库巴曲缬沙坦在射血分数降低的心力衰竭中是一种更优药物吗?随机对照试验综述
Hosp Pharm. 2024 Jun;59(3):282-287. doi: 10.1177/00185787231212619. Epub 2023 Dec 6.
3
Sacubitril/valsartan compared to equivalent/sub-equivalent dose angiotensin receptor blocker or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.
沙库巴曲缬沙坦与等效/低剂量血管紧张素受体阻滞剂或血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂治疗射血分数降低的心力衰竭的比较:一项随机试验的荟萃分析。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2024 Aug;80(8):1113-1120. doi: 10.1007/s00228-024-03686-6. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
4
Evidence for validity of a national physician and patient-reported, cross-sectional survey in China and UK: the Disease Specific Programme.在中国和英国进行的一项全国性医生和患者报告的横断面调查(疾病特定项目)有效性的证据。
BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 16;6(8):e010352. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010352.
5
Risk of hyperkalemia in patients with moderate chronic kidney disease initiating angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers: a randomized study.中度慢性肾脏病患者起始使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂时高钾血症的风险:一项随机研究。
BMC Res Notes. 2013 Aug 1;6:306. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-6-306.