Heath K J, Jones J G
University Department of Anaesthesia, Addenbrookes' Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Anaesthesia. 1998 May;53(5):461-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1998.00373.x.
A questionnaire survey was sent to 164 consultant anaesthetists with the aim of investigating their experiences and attitudes to continuing medical education. The response rate was 79%. Most anaesthetists were motivated to achieve the required number of credits and for the majority of anaesthetists, regional, national and internal departmental discussion meetings were the mainstay of educational activities. The educational standard of available activities could be improved to include more workshop-style learning opportunities and to make journal reading a creditable continuing medical education activity. The place of research is questioned. There was doubt as to whether sanctions such as withdrawing recognition for training should be imposed on departments where some anaesthetists fail to achieve the required number of credits and whether this would motivate anaesthetists to achieve the set standards. Continuing medical education was felt to be effective and the main barriers to attending educational activities are discussed.
为了调查他们对继续医学教育的经历和态度,向164名麻醉科顾问医师发送了一份问卷调查。回复率为79%。大多数麻醉医师有动力获得所需学分,对大多数麻醉医师来说,地区、国家和部门内部的讨论会是教育活动的主要形式。现有活动的教育水平可以提高,以包括更多工作坊式的学习机会,并使期刊阅读成为一项可信的继续医学教育活动。研究的作用受到质疑。对于那些有部分麻醉医师未达到所需学分的科室,是否应实施如取消培训认可等制裁措施,以及这是否会促使麻醉医师达到既定标准,存在疑问。人们认为继续医学教育是有效的,并讨论了参加教育活动的主要障碍。