Blazadonakis M, Moustakis V, Charissis G
Institute of Computer Science, Foundation for Research and Technology, Hellas, Greece.
Artif Intell Med. 1996 Nov;8(6):527-42. doi: 10.1016/s0933-3657(96)00354-5.
Learning from patient records may aid knowledge acquisition and decision making. Existing inductive machine learning (ML) systems such us NewId, CN2, C4.5 and AQ15 learn from past case histories using symbolic and/or numeric values. These systems learn symbolic rules (IF... THEN like) which link an antecedent set of clinical factors to a consequent class or decision. This paper compares the learning performance of alternative ML systems with each other and with respect to a novel approach using logic minimization, called LML, to learn from data. Patient cases were taken from the archives of the Paediatric Surgery Clinic of the University Hospital of Crete, Heraklion, Greece. Comparison of ML system performance is based both on classification accuracy and on informal expert assessment of learned knowledge.
从患者记录中学习可能有助于知识获取和决策制定。现有的归纳机器学习(ML)系统,如NewId、CN2、C4.5和AQ15,使用符号和/或数值从过去的病例历史中学习。这些系统学习符号规则(如IF... THEN),将一组先行临床因素与结果类别或决策联系起来。本文比较了替代ML系统之间以及相对于一种使用逻辑最小化的新方法(称为LML)从数据中学习的学习性能。患者病例取自希腊伊拉克利翁克里特大学医院儿科外科诊所的档案。ML系统性能的比较基于分类准确性和对所学知识的非正式专家评估。