Morein B, Villacrés-Eriksson M, Sjölander A, Bengtsson K L
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 1996 Nov;54(1-4):373-84. doi: 10.1016/s0165-2427(96)05697-8.
Conventionally the efficiency of an adjuvant is measured by the capacity to induce enhanced antibody serum titres and cell mediated immunity (CMI) to a given antigen. Nowadays the capacity of an adjuvant is also measured by the quality as well as the magnitude of the induced immune response, guided by the protective immune response required. Quality includes isotype and IgG subclass responses, T-helper cell responses characterized by the cytokine profile and cytotoxic T cells (CTL). In the early phase of immunization some adjuvants influence the antigen administration and uptake by a so-called depot effect exemplified by aluminium hydroxide gel and oil adjuvants, which possibly is not as desired as alledged. A modern depot is exerted by slow release formulations continuously releasing the antigen over a period of time or by pulses at intervals aiming at 'single injection' vaccine. Great efforts are made to formulate efficient delivery formulations targeting the antigens from the site of administration, to draining lymph nodes or distant lymphatic tissue or to mucosal surfaces by parenteral or mucosal administrations. Nowadays, non-replicating carriers besides replicating vaccines are formulated to induce mucosal immune responses encompassing secretory IgA and CMI. Efforts to evoke immune responses on mucosal membranes distant from the site of administration have resulted mostly in little success. For a long time it was considered that CTL under the restriction of MHC Class I only could be evoked by replicating viruses or intracellular parasites. However, novel adjuvant delivery systems readily induce CTL by delivering the antigen to the APC resulting in intracellular transport to the cytosol for the MHC Class I presentation system, as well as to the endosomal pathway for the MHC Class II presentation.
传统上,佐剂的效率是通过诱导针对特定抗原的抗体血清滴度增强和细胞介导免疫(CMI)的能力来衡量的。如今,佐剂的能力还通过诱导免疫反应的质量和强度来衡量,这由所需的保护性免疫反应来指导。质量包括同种型和IgG亚类反应、以细胞因子谱为特征的辅助性T细胞反应以及细胞毒性T细胞(CTL)。在免疫早期,一些佐剂通过所谓的储存效应影响抗原的给药和摄取,氢氧化铝凝胶和油佐剂就是例证,这种效应可能并不像宣称的那样理想。现代的储存效应是通过缓释制剂来实现的,缓释制剂在一段时间内持续释放抗原,或者通过间隔脉冲释放,目标是实现“单次注射”疫苗。人们做出了巨大努力来配制高效的递送制剂,通过肠胃外或粘膜给药将抗原从给药部位靶向引流淋巴结或远处的淋巴组织或粘膜表面。如今,除了复制型疫苗外,非复制型载体也被配制用于诱导包括分泌型IgA和CMI在内的粘膜免疫反应。在远离给药部位的粘膜上引发免疫反应的努力大多成效甚微。长期以来,人们认为只有复制型病毒或细胞内寄生虫才能在MHC I类限制下诱导CTL。然而,新型佐剂递送系统通过将抗原递送至抗原呈递细胞(APC),使其在细胞内转运至胞质溶胶用于MHC I类呈递系统,以及转运至内体途径用于MHC II类呈递,从而很容易诱导CTL。