Suppr超能文献

联合超滤-血液透析过程中的血管反应性:透析液衍生污染物的影响

Vascular reactivity during combined ultrafiltration-hemodialysis: influence of dialysate-derived contaminants.

作者信息

van Kuijk W H, Buurman W A, Gerlag P G, Leunissen K M

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Am Soc Nephrol. 1996 Dec;7(12):2664-9. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V7122664.

Abstract

It has been suggested that hemodynamic instability and impaired vascular reactivity during combined ultrafiltration-hemodialysis are related to bioincompatibility factors such as dialysate-derived contaminants or the dialyzer. The study presented here investigated whether vascular reactivity could be improved by the use of sterile dialysate. Forearm vascular resistance and venous tone (measured by strain-gauge plethysmography) as well as arterial blood pressure (by Dinamap) and heart rate (by electrocardiogram) were measured in ten stable dialysis patients (age range, 28 to 71 yr) during 2 h of combined ultrafiltration-hemodialysis (bicarbonate; ultrafiltration rate 1.0 L/h). In addition, a dialysate sample was obtained for culture and limulus amebocyte lysate testing while blood was withdrawn for the estimation of plasma bactericidal/permeability increasing factor (measured by ELISA) and the soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor p75 (measured by ELISA). Patients served as their own control, comparing dialysis with nonsterile and sterile dialysate. No bacterial growth was observed in sterile dialysate, whereas all samples were positive for Pseudomonas in culture in nonsterile dialysis. All limulus amebocyte lysate tests were negative. Bactericidal/permeability increasing factor tended to increase during nonsterile dialysis (P = 0.063) and remained unchanged during sterile dialysis. In both treatments, tumor necrosis factor receptor p75 increased significantly (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in hemodynamic parameters between the treatment modalities. Despite use of sterile dialysate, forearm vascular resistance remained unchanged whereas venous tone decreased significantly. These results indicate that vascular reactivity during combined ultrafiltration-hemodialysis is not improved by the use of sterile dialysate.

摘要

有人提出,在联合超滤-血液透析过程中,血流动力学不稳定和血管反应性受损与生物不相容性因素有关,如透析液衍生的污染物或透析器。本文介绍的研究调查了使用无菌透析液是否能改善血管反应性。在10名稳定的透析患者(年龄范围为28至71岁)进行2小时联合超滤-血液透析(碳酸氢盐;超滤率1.0L/h)期间,测量了前臂血管阻力和静脉张力(通过应变片体积描记法测量)以及动脉血压(通过Dinamap测量)和心率(通过心电图测量)。此外,获取一份透析液样本进行培养和鲎试剂检测,同时抽取血液以评估血浆杀菌/通透性增加因子(通过ELISA测量)和可溶性肿瘤坏死因子受体p75(通过ELISA测量)。患者以自身作为对照,比较使用非无菌和无菌透析液进行透析的情况。在无菌透析液中未观察到细菌生长,而在非无菌透析中所有培养样本对假单胞菌均呈阳性。所有鲎试剂检测均为阴性。在非无菌透析期间,杀菌/通透性增加因子有升高趋势(P = 0.063),而在无菌透析期间保持不变。在两种治疗中,肿瘤坏死因子受体p75均显著升高(P < 0.01)。两种治疗方式的血流动力学参数无显著差异。尽管使用了无菌透析液,前臂血管阻力保持不变,而静脉张力显著降低。这些结果表明,使用无菌透析液并不能改善联合超滤-血液透析期间的血管反应性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验