Suppr超能文献

静脉注射碘海醇后通过单次血浆样本测定的肾小球滤过率:可靠吗?

Glomerular filtration rate determined from a single plasma sample after intravenous iohexol injection: is it reliable?

作者信息

Gaspari F, Guerini E, Perico N, Mosconi L, Ruggenenti P, Remuzzi G

机构信息

Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, Bergamo, Italy.

出版信息

J Am Soc Nephrol. 1996 Dec;7(12):2689-93. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V7122689.

Abstract

The iohexol injection plasma clearance method is a good alternative to the inulin clearance method for determination of GFR, but requires multiple blood samples. To avoid this, methods have been developed which derive GFR from a formula that uses a single plasma concentration of the tracer and anthropometric data. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a single plasma sample taken after iohexol injection allows reliable estimation of GFR. In this study, results of single-point determination were compared with those obtained by multiple-point plasma clearance. The GFR of 686 outpatients with different degrees of renal function were recalculated by use of the Jacobsson formula. The optimum time for sampling was found at 10 h after injection of the marker for clearances < 40 mL/min per 1.73 m2, 4 h for clearances between 40 and 99 mL/min per 1.73 m2, and 3 h for clearances > 100 mL/min per 1.73 m2. Results documented that for 75% of the patients, the simplified technique gave an error between -5% to +5% in the evaluation of GFR; for the remaining 25% of the patients, prediction error ranged from -22% to +40%. Furthermore, despite a highly significant correlation between multiple-point iohexol clearance (six plasma samples) and the single-point method (Y = 0.968X + 1.704, r2 = 0.988), the regression intercept was statistically different from 0 and the standard error of the slope estimate established that 95% confidence interval did not include 1.0 (the line of identity), thus indicating that the model can be rejected by the data at a significance level of 0.05. Thus the single-plasma-sample method to determine GFR after radiocontrast injection does not represent a real advantage over the multiple-point method and may lead to unacceptable errors in GFR calculation.

摘要

碘海醇注射血浆清除率法是测定肾小球滤过率(GFR)时替代菊粉清除率法的一种良好方法,但需要采集多个血样。为避免这一情况,已开发出一些方法,这些方法通过使用示踪剂的单一血浆浓度和人体测量数据的公式来推导GFR。本研究的目的是评估碘海醇注射后采集的单个血浆样本是否能可靠地估算GFR。在本研究中,将单点测定结果与通过多点血浆清除率获得的结果进行了比较。使用雅各布森公式重新计算了686例不同肾功能程度门诊患者的GFR。对于清除率<40 mL/(min·1.73 m²)的情况,发现注射标记物后10小时为最佳采样时间;清除率在40至99 mL/(min·1.73 m²)之间时,最佳采样时间为4小时;清除率>100 mL/(min·1.73 m²)时,最佳采样时间为3小时。结果表明,对于75%的患者,简化技术在评估GFR时产生的误差在-5%至+5%之间;对于其余25%的患者,预测误差范围为-22%至+40%。此外,尽管多点碘海醇清除率(六个血浆样本)与单点法之间存在高度显著相关性(Y = 0.968X + 1.704,r² = 0.988),但回归截距在统计学上与0不同,斜率估计的标准误差表明95%置信区间不包括1.0(恒等线),因此表明该模型在显著性水平为0.05时可被数据拒绝。因此,造影剂注射后测定GFR的单血浆样本法相对于多点法并无实际优势,且可能导致GFR计算中出现不可接受的误差。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验