Suppr超能文献

全身应用博来霉素或阿霉素联合局部热疗对原发性肿瘤及肺转移瘤的影响。

Effects of systemically administered bleomycin or adriamycin with local hyperthermia on primary tumor and lung metastases.

作者信息

Marmor J B, Kozak D, Hahn G M

出版信息

Cancer Treat Rep. 1979 Aug;63(8):1279-90.

PMID:89906
Abstract

Exposure of cells in tissue culture to bleomycin or Adriamycin during 43 degrees C hyperthermia increased cytotoxicity dramatically compared to exposure at 37 degrees C. This study was designed to test whether this interaction was useful in tumor-bearing animals. C3H mice bearing the KHT tumor were treated with bleomycin (7 or 15 mg/kg) or with Adriamycin (2.5 or 5 mg/kg) with or without local heating of the tumor to 43 degrees C for 30 minutes by 13.56 MHz radiofrequency fields. The effects were assessed by growth delay (mean tumor diameter doubling time) and cure rate. In separate experiments, BALB/c mice bearing EMT6 tumors were treated identically, but tumors were excised 2 hours after treatment and tumor cell survival was assayed by colony formation. Antitumor effects of systemic bleomycin were potentiated by local hyperthermia. The two modalities had to be administered close together in time to observe the potentiation, suggesting a true interaction. There was a "threshold" for bleomycin potentiation in vivo between 42 degrees C and 43 degrees C, just as observed in tissue culture experiments. The antitumor activity of Adriamycin was not potentiated in vivo in these tumor systems except in cell survival experiments at doses higher than those compatible with survival of the host. The toxicity of drug combined with heat was greater than that of either modality alone. Hyperthermia did not adversely affect the incidence or severity of spontaneous lung metastases from KHT tumors. In fact, groups treated with heat and bleomycin had less severe lung metastases than groups treated with bleomycin alone. We conclude that local heating of tumors may be a useful adjunct to systemic bleomycin therapy. In vivo potentiation of Adriamycin by heat, however, could not be demonstrated in these tumor systems.

摘要

与在37℃下暴露相比,在43℃热疗期间将组织培养中的细胞暴露于博来霉素或阿霉素会显著增加细胞毒性。本研究旨在测试这种相互作用在荷瘤动物中是否有用。携带KHT肿瘤的C3H小鼠接受博来霉素(7或15mg/kg)或阿霉素(2.5或5mg/kg)治疗,同时或不通过13.56MHz射频场将肿瘤局部加热至43℃ 30分钟。通过生长延迟(平均肿瘤直径倍增时间)和治愈率评估效果。在单独的实验中,携带EMT6肿瘤的BALB/c小鼠接受相同的治疗,但在治疗后2小时切除肿瘤,并通过集落形成测定肿瘤细胞存活率。局部热疗增强了全身博来霉素的抗肿瘤作用。这两种治疗方式必须在时间上紧密相连才能观察到增强作用,这表明存在真正的相互作用。正如在组织培养实验中观察到的那样,体内博来霉素增强作用在42℃至43℃之间存在一个“阈值”。在这些肿瘤系统中,除了在高于宿主存活剂量的细胞存活实验中,阿霉素的抗肿瘤活性在体内没有增强。药物与热联合使用的毒性大于单独使用任何一种治疗方式的毒性。热疗对KHT肿瘤自发肺转移的发生率或严重程度没有不利影响。事实上,接受热疗和博来霉素治疗的组比单独接受博来霉素治疗的组肺转移程度较轻。我们得出结论,肿瘤局部加热可能是全身博来霉素治疗的有用辅助手段。然而,在这些肿瘤系统中未能证明热疗在体内增强阿霉素的作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验