• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项亲子药物教育项目的评估。

Evaluation of a parent child drug education program.

作者信息

Young M, Kersten C, Werch C

机构信息

Program in Health Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701, USA.

出版信息

J Drug Educ. 1996;26(1):57-68. doi: 10.2190/21BQ-TCYF-FVAP-P947.

DOI:10.2190/21BQ-TCYF-FVAP-P947
PMID:8991969
Abstract

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a parent-child drug education program. One thousand four hundred and forty-seven fourth, fifth, and sixth grade students and 2,036 of their parents participated in the study. Results indicated that the program produced changes in the responses of children and their parents to questions concerning attitudes, use, perceptions of use, and intended use of drugs.

摘要

该研究的目的是评估一项亲子毒品教育计划的效果。1447名四、五、六年级学生及其2036名家长参与了这项研究。结果表明,该计划使儿童及其家长在有关毒品态度、使用情况、对使用的认知以及预期使用方面的问题回答上产生了变化。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a parent child drug education program.一项亲子药物教育项目的评估。
J Drug Educ. 1996;26(1):57-68. doi: 10.2190/21BQ-TCYF-FVAP-P947.
2
Substance abuse in sixth grade: results of a prevention program on adolescents' self-reported drug-related attitudes and behavior.六年级学生的药物滥用:一项关于青少年自我报告的与药物相关态度和行为的预防计划的结果。
Psychol Rep. 2004 Feb;94(1):225-6. doi: 10.2466/pr0.94.1.225-226.
3
The impact of a parent-directed intervention on parent-child communication about tobacco and alcohol.一项由家长主导的干预措施对亲子间关于烟草和酒精交流的影响。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2008 Nov;27(6):591-601. doi: 10.1080/09595230801935698.
4
Evaluation of a family-based substance abuse prevention program targeted for the middle school years.针对中学阶段的一项基于家庭的药物滥用预防项目评估。
J Drug Educ. 2000;30(2):213-28. doi: 10.2190/GT8C-ELWH-HY94-ECG9.
5
Effects of a take-home drug prevention program on drug-related communication and beliefs of parents and children.一项家庭药物预防计划对家长和孩子与药物相关的沟通及观念的影响。
J Sch Health. 1991 Oct;61(8):346-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.1991.tb07414.x.
6
Teacher ratings of student risk for substance use as a function of specialized training.
J Drug Educ. 1993;23(1):83-95. doi: 10.2190/EUGT-G9HA-RM65-GLM6.
7
Why target early adolescents and parents in alcohol prevention? The mediating effects of self-control, rules and attitudes about alcohol use.为什么要将青少年早期及其父母作为预防酒精使用的目标人群?自我控制、关于酒精使用的规则和态度的中介作用。
Addiction. 2011 Mar;106(3):538-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03198.x. Epub 2010 Nov 9.
8
Two-year follow-up of a social-cognitive intervention to prevent substance use.一项预防药物使用的社会认知干预的两年随访
J Drug Educ. 1992;22(2):101-14. doi: 10.2190/T3BF-5XRL-EX6P-WNTF.
9
Evaluating community coalitions for prevention of substance abuse: the case of Project Freedom.评估社区联盟预防药物滥用情况:以“自由计划”为例。
Health Educ Behav. 1997 Dec;24(6):812-28. doi: 10.1177/109019819702400614.
10
The assessment of parent-led prevention programs: a preliminary assessment of impact.
J Drug Educ. 1990;20(1):77-94. doi: 10.2190/BMB6-7CEE-XUHT-KMEE.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effectiveness of Family Interventions in Preventing Adolescent Illicit Drug Use: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.家庭干预在预防青少年非法药物使用中的有效性:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2015 Sep;18(3):218-39. doi: 10.1007/s10567-015-0185-7.
2
Family-based programmes for preventing smoking by children and adolescents.针对儿童和青少年预防吸烟的家庭干预项目。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Feb 27;2015(2):CD004493. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004493.pub3.
3
School-based programmes for preventing smoking.
以学校为基础的预防吸烟计划。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30;2013(4):CD001293. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001293.pub3.
4
Brief Image-based Health Behavior Messages for Adolescents and Their Parents.面向青少年及其父母的基于图像的简短健康行为信息
J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse. 2008 Aug;17(4):19-40. doi: 10.1080/15470650802231887.