Suppr超能文献

一氧化氮合酶抑制剂甲基精氨酸和氨基胍作为大鼠佐剂性关节炎预防和治疗药物的比较

Comparison of the nitric oxide synthase inhibitors methylarginine and aminoguanidine as prophylactic and therapeutic agents in rat adjuvant arthritis.

作者信息

Stefanovic-Racic M, Meyers K, Meschter C, Coffey J W, Hoffman R A, Evans C H

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA 15261, USA.

出版信息

J Rheumatol. 1995 Oct;22(10):1922-8.

PMID:8991992
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitors NG-methyl-L-arginine (L-NMA) and aminoguanidine (AG) as prophylactic and therapeutic agents in rat adjuvant induced arthritis (AIA).

METHODS

Arthritis was induced in male Lewis rats by the injection of adjuvant into the base of the tail. L-NMA or AG was administered twice daily by gastric intubation starting at the time of adjuvant injection, just before the onset of clinical symptoms, or after the onset of clinical symptoms. Paw swelling, plasma fibrinogen levels and urinary NO2-/NO3- excretion were measured to assess the effect of the inhibitors on the arthritis response and whole body NO biosynthesis. Selected joints were also evaluated histopathologically. The abilities of L-NMA, AG and another NOS inhibitor, NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), to inhibit NO production by chondrocytes and synoviocytes were also compared.

RESULTS

Treatment with L-NMA (400 mg/kg/day) or AG (500 mg/kg/day) reduced the urinary excretion of NO2-/NO3- to the control level. L-NMA suppressed the development of AIA when administered prophylactically; however, its antiarthritic properties declined with increasing delay of application. It was only weakly effective against established AIA. AG had neither a prophylactic nor a therapeutic antiarthritic effect. AG and L-NAME were much weaker inhibitors of NO production by chondrocytes and synoviocytes than L-NMA.

CONCLUSION

Although L-NMA completely suppresses the development of AIA when administered prophylactically, it is much less effective when administered therapeutically. Furthermore, not all inhibitors of NOS show equal prophylactic activity against AIA. In addition, NOS inhibitors may be only weakly therapeutic, or even detrimental, in established disease. These findings should be considered when evaluating NOS inhibitors as potential therapeutic agents for the treatment of established human arthritis.

摘要

目的

比较一氧化氮合酶(NOS)抑制剂N-甲基-L-精氨酸(L-NMA)和氨基胍(AG)作为大鼠佐剂诱导性关节炎(AIA)预防和治疗药物的效果。

方法

通过在雄性Lewis大鼠尾根部注射佐剂诱导关节炎。从佐剂注射时、临床症状出现前或临床症状出现后开始,每天经胃插管给予L-NMA或AG两次。测量爪肿胀、血浆纤维蛋白原水平和尿中NO2-/NO3-排泄量,以评估抑制剂对关节炎反应和全身NO生物合成的影响。还对选定的关节进行组织病理学评估。此外,比较了L-NMA、AG和另一种NOS抑制剂N-硝基-L-精氨酸甲酯(L-NAME)抑制软骨细胞和滑膜细胞产生NO的能力。

结果

用L-NMA(400mg/kg/天)或AG(500mg/kg/天)治疗可使尿中NO2-/NO3-排泄量降至对照水平。预防性给予L-NMA可抑制AIA的发展;然而,随着给药延迟时间的增加,其抗关节炎特性下降。它对已形成的AIA疗效甚微。AG既无预防也无治疗性抗关节炎作用。AG和L-NAME抑制软骨细胞和滑膜细胞产生NO的能力比L-NMA弱得多。

结论

虽然预防性给予L-NMA可完全抑制AIA的发展,但治疗性给药时效果要差得多。此外,并非所有NOS抑制剂对AIA都具有相同的预防活性。此外,NOS抑制剂在已形成的疾病中可能疗效甚微,甚至有害。在评估NOS抑制剂作为治疗已确诊人类关节炎的潜在治疗药物时,应考虑这些发现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验