Morse D
Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis 95616-8521, USA.
J Anim Sci. 1996 Dec;74(12):3103-11. doi: 10.2527/1996.74123103x.
A greater focus of legislative mandates is directed toward nonpoint sources of pollution. This article focuses on environmental regulations and their impact on cattle production. Key legislation will be reviewed to stress how variations in the type of law, degree of impact, enforcement mechanism, and time line for compliance affect the ability for research to be designed and accomplished in a desired time frame and to yield data on which imposed management practices should be based. Science-based regulations are desired to maximize beneficial impacts of management practices; however, many regulations are developed and management practices are imposed prior to research to minimize liability of the regulatory agency in case natural resources are degraded in the absence of management practices. The technology adoption process will be reviewed. Documented impact of imposed management practices (technology adoption) will be presented. Of particular interest is the importance of documenting the economic and resource impacts of regulations on livestock operators. Types of research needed prior to implementing management practices will be reviewed. Local involvement can increase the adoption rate of practices and technologies.
立法授权更多地聚焦于非点源污染。本文关注环境法规及其对养牛业的影响。将对关键立法进行审视,以强调法律类型、影响程度、执行机制和合规期限的差异如何影响在预期时间框架内设计和完成研究的能力,以及获取作为制定强制管理措施依据的数据的能力。基于科学的法规有助于使管理措施的有益影响最大化;然而,许多法规在研究之前就已制定并实施管理措施,以在缺乏管理措施导致自然资源退化时,尽量减少监管机构的责任。将对技术采用过程进行审视。将介绍强制管理措施(技术采用)的记录在案的影响。特别令人感兴趣的是记录法规对畜牧经营者的经济和资源影响的重要性。将审视实施管理措施之前所需的研究类型。地方参与可以提高措施和技术的采用率。