Suppr超能文献

全科医疗中腰痛患者拉塞格征的观察者间可重复性。

The inter-observer reproducibility of Lasègue's sign in patients with low back pain in general practice.

作者信息

van den Hoogen H J, Koes B W, Devillé W, van Eijk J T, Bouter L M

机构信息

Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Dec;46(413):727-30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The spectrum of low back pain patients in general practice differs significantly from that in an orthopaedic clinic. The most frequent specific cause of low back pain is nerve-root irritation or compression caused by intervertebral protrusion, and the diagnosis is still problematic. Testing for Lasègue's sign could be a useful way of detecting high-risk patients, but so far the reproducibility of the test has been measured only in hospital-based studies.

AIM

To assess the inter-observer reproducibility of Lasègue's sign in general practice.

METHOD

Fifteen General practitioners from Amsterdam and the surrounding areas tested all consecutive low back pain patients who visited them during a period of two years for Lasègue's sign. The test was repeated within two weeks in two samples: sample I consisted of 50 consecutive low back pain patients; sample II consisted of all patients who had pelvic tilt, scoliosis, or positive Lasègue's sign.

RESULTS

In sample I, the observation was repeated in 49 patients. The Kappa coefficient was 0.33, and the proportions of positive and negative agreement were 33% and 96%, respectively. In sample II, the observation was repeated in 48 patients. The Kappa coefficient was 0.56, whereas the proportion of positive agreement was 67% and the proportion of negative agreement was 91%.

CONCLUSIONS

The reproducibility of Lasègue's sign in routine general practice seems to be low, but may be similar to the reproducibility observed in hospital settings in selected patients who have a high chance of low back pain owing to a specific disease.

摘要

背景

全科医疗中腰痛患者的情况与骨科门诊的患者有显著差异。腰痛最常见的具体原因是椎间盘突出导致的神经根刺激或受压,而诊断仍然存在问题。直腿抬高试验可能是检测高危患者的一种有用方法,但到目前为止,该试验的可重复性仅在基于医院的研究中进行过测量。

目的

评估直腿抬高试验在全科医疗中的观察者间可重复性。

方法

来自阿姆斯特丹及周边地区的15名全科医生对在两年期间前来就诊的所有连续性腰痛患者进行直腿抬高试验。在两周内对两个样本重复进行该试验:样本I由50名连续性腰痛患者组成;样本II由所有有骨盆倾斜、脊柱侧弯或直腿抬高试验阳性的患者组成。

结果

在样本I中,对49名患者重复进行了观察。kappa系数为0.33,阳性一致性比例和阴性一致性比例分别为33%和96%。在样本II中,对48名患者重复进行了观察。kappa系数为0.56,阳性一致性比例为67%,阴性一致性比例为91%。

结论

直腿抬高试验在常规全科医疗中的可重复性似乎较低,但可能与在医院环境中对因特定疾病而有较高腰痛几率的选定患者所观察到的可重复性相似。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

4
Normality and reliability in the clinical assessment of backache.背痛临床评估中的正常性与可靠性。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982 May 22;284(6328):1519-23. doi: 10.1136/bmj.284.6328.1519.
7
1989 Volvo Award in clinical sciences. Reproducibility of physical signs in low-back pain.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1989 Sep;14(9):908-18. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198909000-00002.
9
Diurnal changes in straight leg raising.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990 Feb;15(2):103-6. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199002000-00010.
10
High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes.高一致性但低卡帕值:II. 解决悖论
J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(6):551-8. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(90)90159-m.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验