• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The inter-observer reproducibility of Lasègue's sign in patients with low back pain in general practice.全科医疗中腰痛患者拉塞格征的观察者间可重复性。
Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Dec;46(413):727-30.
2
The sensitivity and specificity of the Slump and the Straight Leg Raising tests in patients with lumbar disc herniation.腰椎间盘突出症患者中垂肩试验和直腿抬高试验的敏感性和特异性。
J Clin Rheumatol. 2008 Apr;14(2):87-91. doi: 10.1097/RHU.0b013e31816b2f99.
3
Instrumental straight-leg raising: a new approach to Lasègue's test.器械直腿抬高:一种改良的拉塞格试验方法
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1991 Nov;72(12):959-66.
4
Cecin's Sign ("X" Sign): improving the diagnosis of radicular compression by herniated lumbar disks.塞辛征(“X”征):提高腰椎间盘突出症神经根受压的诊断准确性
Rev Bras Reumatol. 2010 Jan-Feb;50(1):44-55.
5
[Relevance of nerve blocks in treating and diagnosing low back pain--is the quality decisive?].[神经阻滞在治疗和诊断腰背痛中的相关性——质量起决定性作用吗?]
Schmerz. 2001 Dec;15(6):474-83. doi: 10.1007/s004820100035.
6
Interexaminer reliability of the hip extension test for suspected impaired motor control of the lumbar spine.针对疑似腰椎运动控制受损情况的髋关节伸展试验的检查者间可靠性。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006 Jun;29(5):374-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.04.012.
7
Inter-examiner reliability of a classification system for patients with non-specific low back pain.非特异性下腰痛患者分类系统的检查者间信度
Man Ther. 2009 Oct;14(5):555-61. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2008.08.003. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
8
Evaluation of orthopedic testing of the low back for nonspecific lower back pain.非特异性下背痛的腰椎骨科检查评估
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1998 May;21(4):232-6.
9
Efficacy and safety of eperisone in patients with low back pain: a double blind randomized study.乙哌立松治疗腰痛患者的疗效和安全性:一项双盲随机研究。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2008 Jul-Aug;12(4):229-35.
10
Observer variability based on the strength of MR scanners in the assessment of lumbar degenerative disc disease.基于磁共振成像(MR)扫描仪强度的观察者变异性在腰椎退行性椎间盘疾病评估中的作用
Eur J Radiol. 2004 Sep;51(3):202-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2003.08.004.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison between rasterstereographic scan and orthopedic examination for posture assessment: an observational study.光栅立体扫描与骨科检查在姿势评估中的比较:一项观察性研究。
Front Surg. 2024 Oct 10;11:1461569. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1461569. eCollection 2024.
2
The Use of Passive Straight Leg Raising Test: A Survey of Clinicians.被动直腿抬高试验的应用:临床医生调查
Malays Orthop J. 2015 Nov;9(3):44-48. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.1511.012.
3
Inter-examiner reliability in the assessment of low back pain (LBP) using the Kirkaldy-Willis classification (KWC).使用柯卡尔迪-威利斯分类法(KWC)评估下腰痛(LBP)时的检查者间可靠性。
Eur Spine J. 2006 Nov;15(11):1695-703. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-0050-3. Epub 2006 Jan 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Protrusions of the lumbar intervertebral discs, a clinical review based on five hundred cases treated by excision of the protrusion.腰椎间盘突出症:基于500例突出物切除术治疗病例的临床综述
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1951 Feb;33-B(1):8-30. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.33B1.8.
2
Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in people without back pain.无背痛人群的腰椎磁共振成像
N Engl J Med. 1994 Jul 14;331(2):69-73. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199407143310201.
3
On the accuracy of history, physical examination, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate in diagnosing low back pain in general practice. A criteria-based review of the literature.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Feb 1;20(3):318-27. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199502000-00010.
4
Normality and reliability in the clinical assessment of backache.背痛临床评估中的正常性与可靠性。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982 May 22;284(6328):1519-23. doi: 10.1136/bmj.284.6328.1519.
5
Charles Lasègue and his 'Considerations on Sciatica'.
JAMA. 1985;253(12):1767-8.
6
Incidence and risk factors of herniated lumbar intervertebral disc or sciatica leading to hospitalization.导致住院的腰椎间盘突出症或坐骨神经痛的发病率及危险因素。
J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(3):251-8. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90161-5.
7
1989 Volvo Award in clinical sciences. Reproducibility of physical signs in low-back pain.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1989 Sep;14(9):908-18. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198909000-00002.
8
High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes.高一致性但低卡帕值:I. 两个悖论的问题。
J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(6):543-9. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(90)90158-l.
9
Diurnal changes in straight leg raising.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990 Feb;15(2):103-6. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199002000-00010.
10
High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes.高一致性但低卡帕值:II. 解决悖论
J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(6):551-8. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(90)90159-m.

全科医疗中腰痛患者拉塞格征的观察者间可重复性。

The inter-observer reproducibility of Lasègue's sign in patients with low back pain in general practice.

作者信息

van den Hoogen H J, Koes B W, Devillé W, van Eijk J T, Bouter L M

机构信息

Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Dec;46(413):727-30.

PMID:8995852
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1239862/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The spectrum of low back pain patients in general practice differs significantly from that in an orthopaedic clinic. The most frequent specific cause of low back pain is nerve-root irritation or compression caused by intervertebral protrusion, and the diagnosis is still problematic. Testing for Lasègue's sign could be a useful way of detecting high-risk patients, but so far the reproducibility of the test has been measured only in hospital-based studies.

AIM

To assess the inter-observer reproducibility of Lasègue's sign in general practice.

METHOD

Fifteen General practitioners from Amsterdam and the surrounding areas tested all consecutive low back pain patients who visited them during a period of two years for Lasègue's sign. The test was repeated within two weeks in two samples: sample I consisted of 50 consecutive low back pain patients; sample II consisted of all patients who had pelvic tilt, scoliosis, or positive Lasègue's sign.

RESULTS

In sample I, the observation was repeated in 49 patients. The Kappa coefficient was 0.33, and the proportions of positive and negative agreement were 33% and 96%, respectively. In sample II, the observation was repeated in 48 patients. The Kappa coefficient was 0.56, whereas the proportion of positive agreement was 67% and the proportion of negative agreement was 91%.

CONCLUSIONS

The reproducibility of Lasègue's sign in routine general practice seems to be low, but may be similar to the reproducibility observed in hospital settings in selected patients who have a high chance of low back pain owing to a specific disease.

摘要

背景

全科医疗中腰痛患者的情况与骨科门诊的患者有显著差异。腰痛最常见的具体原因是椎间盘突出导致的神经根刺激或受压,而诊断仍然存在问题。直腿抬高试验可能是检测高危患者的一种有用方法,但到目前为止,该试验的可重复性仅在基于医院的研究中进行过测量。

目的

评估直腿抬高试验在全科医疗中的观察者间可重复性。

方法

来自阿姆斯特丹及周边地区的15名全科医生对在两年期间前来就诊的所有连续性腰痛患者进行直腿抬高试验。在两周内对两个样本重复进行该试验:样本I由50名连续性腰痛患者组成;样本II由所有有骨盆倾斜、脊柱侧弯或直腿抬高试验阳性的患者组成。

结果

在样本I中,对49名患者重复进行了观察。kappa系数为0.33,阳性一致性比例和阴性一致性比例分别为33%和96%。在样本II中,对48名患者重复进行了观察。kappa系数为0.56,阳性一致性比例为67%,阴性一致性比例为91%。

结论

直腿抬高试验在常规全科医疗中的可重复性似乎较低,但可能与在医院环境中对因特定疾病而有较高腰痛几率的选定患者所观察到的可重复性相似。