• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用柯卡尔迪-威利斯分类法(KWC)评估下腰痛(LBP)时的检查者间可靠性。

Inter-examiner reliability in the assessment of low back pain (LBP) using the Kirkaldy-Willis classification (KWC).

作者信息

Bertilson Bo C, Bring Johan, Sjöblom Anneli, Sundell Karin, Strender Lars-Erik

机构信息

Karolinska Institutet, Center for Family Medicine, Alfred Nobels ellé 12, Huddinge, Stockholm, 141 83, Sweden.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2006 Nov;15(11):1695-703. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-0050-3. Epub 2006 Jan 25.

DOI:10.1007/s00586-005-0050-3
PMID:16435110
Abstract

Reliable classification systems and clinical tests are sought for the care of patients with low back pain (LBP). The objectives of this clinical study were to evaluate inter-examiner reliability in the classification of patients with LBP, the influence of radiological findings on the classification and the reliability of some clinical tests. Two examiners independently assessed 50 outpatients with LBP. Inter-examiner reliability in classification of patients with LBP using Kirkkaldy-Willis classification (KWC) system and in 30 clinical tests was calculated as percentage agreement and kappa coefficients (kappa). Inter-examiner reliability was excellent (kappa>0.8) for classification according to KWC. Radiological findings did not influence the reliability. Age of the patient, movement range, and pain and neurological signs seemed to guide the decision on classification. The reliability of clinical tests was good (kappa>0.6) in 6 tests and moderate (kappa>0.4) in 12 tests. Good inter-examiner reliability was found for the SLR test, movement range and sensibility testing with spurs in dermatome areas. We conclude that the KWC for classifying patients with LBP seems to be a reliable classification system depending on a few key observations and that moderate and good inter-examiner reliability can be achieved in several clinical tests in the assessment of LBP.

摘要

人们一直在寻找可靠的分类系统和临床测试方法来治疗腰痛(LBP)患者。本临床研究的目的是评估检查者间在腰痛患者分类中的可靠性、影像学检查结果对分类的影响以及一些临床测试的可靠性。两名检查者独立评估了50例腰痛门诊患者。使用柯卡尔迪 - 威利斯分类(KWC)系统对腰痛患者进行分类以及30项临床测试中的检查者间可靠性,通过一致性百分比和kappa系数(kappa)来计算。根据KWC分类的检查者间可靠性极佳(kappa>0.8)。影像学检查结果不影响可靠性。患者年龄、活动范围、疼痛和神经体征似乎指导了分类决策。6项临床测试的可靠性良好(kappa>0.6),12项临床测试的可靠性中等(kappa>0.4)。直腿抬高试验、活动范围以及皮节区域带刺激的感觉测试的检查者间可靠性良好。我们得出结论,用于腰痛患者分类的KWC似乎是一个可靠的分类系统,它依赖于一些关键观察结果,并且在评估腰痛的多项临床测试中可以实现中等和良好的检查者间可靠性。

相似文献

1
Inter-examiner reliability in the assessment of low back pain (LBP) using the Kirkaldy-Willis classification (KWC).使用柯卡尔迪-威利斯分类法(KWC)评估下腰痛(LBP)时的检查者间可靠性。
Eur Spine J. 2006 Nov;15(11):1695-703. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-0050-3. Epub 2006 Jan 25.
2
Inter-examiner reliability of a proposed decision-making treatment based classification system for low back pain patients.一种针对腰痛患者的拟议决策治疗分类系统的检查者间可靠性。
Man Ther. 2012 Apr;17(2):164-71. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2011.12.009. Epub 2012 Jan 20.
3
Interrater reliability of a movement impairment-based classification system for lumbar spine syndromes in patients with chronic low back pain.慢性下腰痛患者腰椎综合征基于运动障碍的分类系统的评分者间信度。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008 Jun;38(6):371-6. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2008.2760. Epub 2008 Jan 22.
4
Inter-examiner reliability of a classification system for patients with non-specific low back pain.非特异性下腰痛患者分类系统的检查者间信度
Man Ther. 2009 Oct;14(5):555-61. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2008.08.003. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
5
The inter-examiner reliability of a classification method for non-specific chronic low back pain patients with motor control impairment.针对伴有运动控制障碍的非特异性慢性下腰痛患者的一种分类方法的检查者间可靠性。
Man Ther. 2006 Feb;11(1):28-39. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2005.02.001. Epub 2005 Jun 3.
6
Inter- and intra-examiner reliability of single and composites of selected motion palpation and pain provocation tests for sacroiliac joint.骶髂关节特定运动触诊和疼痛激发试验单项及组合检查者间和检查者内的可靠性
Man Ther. 2009 Apr;14(2):213-21. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2008.02.004. Epub 2008 Mar 25.
7
The inter-tester reliability of physical therapists classifying low back pain problems based on the movement system impairment classification system.物理治疗师基于运动系统损伤分类系统对下背痛问题进行分类的测试者间信度。
PM R. 2009 Feb;1(2):117-26. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2008.08.001. Epub 2008 Dec 27.
8
Reliability of physical examination items used for classification of patients with low back pain.用于腰痛患者分类的体格检查项目的可靠性。
Phys Ther. 1998 Sep;78(9):979-88. doi: 10.1093/ptj/78.9.979.
9
Inter-tester reliability of discriminatory examination items for sub-classifying non-specific low back pain.非特异性下腰痛亚类分类鉴别检查项目的观察者间可靠性。
J Rehabil Med. 2012 Oct;44(10):851-7. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0950.
10
The use of the comprehensive International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Core Set for low back pain in clinical practice: a reliability study.《功能、残疾与健康国际分类综合核心集在腰痛临床实践中的应用:一项可靠性研究》
Physiother Res Int. 2009 Sep;14(3):147-66. doi: 10.1002/pri.436.

引用本文的文献

1
A physical therapist and nurse practitioner model of care for chronic back pain using telehealth: Diagnostic and management concordance.一种使用远程医疗的慢性腰痛物理治疗师和护士从业者护理模式:诊断和管理一致性。
J Telemed Telecare. 2024 Jun;30(5):842-850. doi: 10.1177/1357633X221098904. Epub 2022 May 12.
2
Early surgery with antibiotic medication was effective and efficient in treating pyogenic spondylodiscitis.早期手术联合抗生素治疗化脓性脊椎间盘炎有效且高效。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Mar 18;22(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04155-2.
3
The reliability of clinical judgments and criteria associated with mechanisms-based classifications of pain in patients with low back pain disorders: a preliminary reliability study.

本文引用的文献

1
Correlation of radiographic and MRI parameters to morphological and biochemical assessment of intervertebral disc degeneration.X线和MRI参数与椎间盘退变的形态学及生化评估的相关性
Eur Spine J. 2005 Feb;14(1):27-35. doi: 10.1007/s00586-004-0759-4. Epub 2004 Jun 26.
2
Inter-tester reliability of a new diagnostic classification system for patients with non-specific low back pain.一种针对非特异性下腰痛患者的新诊断分类系统的测试者间可靠性。
Aust J Physiother. 2004;50(2):85-94. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(14)60100-8.
3
Evidence for spinal cord hypersensitivity in chronic pain after whiplash injury and in fibromyalgia.
与下背痛疾病患者基于机制的疼痛分类相关的临床判断和标准的可靠性:一项初步可靠性研究。
J Man Manip Ther. 2010 Jun;18(2):102-10. doi: 10.1179/106698110X12640740712897.
4
Assessment of nerve involvement in the lumbar spine: agreement between magnetic resonance imaging, physical examination and pain drawing findings.腰椎神经受累评估:磁共振成像、体格检查和疼痛图结果的一致性。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Sep 10;11:202. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-202.
5
The inter-tester reliability of physical therapists classifying low back pain problems based on the movement system impairment classification system.物理治疗师基于运动系统损伤分类系统对下背痛问题进行分类的测试者间信度。
PM R. 2009 Feb;1(2):117-26. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2008.08.001. Epub 2008 Dec 27.
鞭打损伤后慢性疼痛及纤维肌痛中脊髓超敏反应的证据。
Pain. 2004 Jan;107(1-2):7-15. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2003.05.001.
4
Reliability of clinical tests in the assessment of patients with neck/shoulder problems-impact of history.颈部/肩部问题患者评估中临床检查的可靠性——病史的影响
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Oct 1;28(19):2222-31. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000089685.55629.2E.
5
Interexaminer reliability of low back pain assessment using the McKenzie method.采用麦肯齐方法评估下背痛的检查者间可靠性。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Apr 15;27(8):E207-14. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200204150-00016.
6
Discriminative and predictive validity assessment of the quebec task force classification.魁北克特别工作组分类法的判别效度和预测效度评估。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Apr 15;27(8):851-7. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200204150-00013.
7
Clinical guidelines for the management of low back pain in primary care: an international comparison.初级保健中腰痛管理的临床指南:一项国际比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Nov 15;26(22):2504-13; discussion 2513-4. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200111150-00022.
8
The effects of common medical interventions on pain, back function, and work resumption in patients with chronic low back pain: A prospective 2-year cohort study in six countries.常见医学干预措施对慢性下腰痛患者疼痛、背部功能及恢复工作的影响:一项在六个国家开展的为期2年的前瞻性队列研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 1;25(23):3055-64. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012010-00013.
9
Assessing the needs of patients in pain: a matter of opinion?
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Nov 1;25(21):2816-23. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200011010-00015.
10
The use of nonorganic signs and symptoms as a screening tool for return-to-work in patients with acute low back pain.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Aug 1;25(15):1925-31. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200008010-00010.