Auta J, Winsauer P J, Faust W B, Lambert P, Moerschbaecher J M
Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Louisiana State University, New Orleans, USA.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1997 Jan;280(1):316-25.
A multiple schedule of repeated acquisition and performance of conditional discriminations was used to characterize the effects of two negative allosteric modulators of the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABAA) receptor (ethyl beta-carboline-3-carboxylate [beta-CCE] and N-methyl-beta-carboline-3-carboxamide [FG-7142]), a hallucinogenic beta-carboline derivative (harmine), a benzodiazepine receptor antagonist (flumazenil) and a positive allosteric modulator (alprazolam). In the acquisition component, subjects acquired a different discrimination each session. Acquisition of a discrimination was defined by a decrease in errors as the session progressed. In the performance component, the discrimination was the same each session. Responding in both components was maintained by food presentation under a variable-ratio schedule. Incorrect responses in both components produced a 5-sec timeout. Alprazolam (0.1-18 mg/kg), beta-CCE (0.01-0.32 mg/kg), FG-7142 (0.1-18 mg/kg) and harmine (0.1-1.8 mg/kg) all dose-dependently decreased response rate in both components. However, accuracy of responding-was differentially affected by the drugs. Alprazolam selectively and dose-dependently increased percent errors in acquisition, whereas beta-CCE increased acquisition errors only at the highest doses tested in each subject. In contrast, FG-7142 and harmine had no effects on percent errors at doses that virtually eliminated responding. In all cases, performance accuracy was generally not affected. Flumazenil, at doses that had little or no effect (0.1 and 0.32 mg/kg) or occasionally decreased response rates (1 mg/kg) when administered alone, dose-dependently antagonized the rate-decreasing and error-increasing effects of beta-CCE, FG-7142 and alprazolam. In contrast, flumazenil failed to antagonize the effects of harmine. Thus, the negative allosteric modulators only moderately disrupted acquisition in comparison with the positive allosteric modulator, but the effects of both types of modulator were antagonized by the benzodiazepine antagonist flumazenil.
采用重复习得和执行条件性辨别任务的多重程序,来表征γ-氨基丁酸(GABAA)受体的两种负变构调节剂(β-咔啉-3-羧酸乙酯[β-CCE]和N-甲基-β-咔啉-3-甲酰胺[FG-7142])、一种致幻性β-咔啉衍生物(骆驼蓬碱)、一种苯二氮䓬受体拮抗剂(氟马西尼)和一种正变构调节剂(阿普唑仑)的作用。在习得部分,受试者每次实验习得一种不同的辨别任务。辨别任务的习得通过随着实验进行错误减少来定义。在执行部分,每次实验的辨别任务相同。两个部分的反应均通过可变比率程序下的食物呈现来维持。两个部分的错误反应都会导致5秒的超时。阿普唑仑(0.1 - 18毫克/千克)、β-CCE(0.01 - 0.32毫克/千克)、FG-7142(0.1 - 18毫克/千克)和骆驼蓬碱(0.1 - 1.8毫克/千克)均剂量依赖性地降低了两个部分的反应率。然而,药物对反应准确性的影响存在差异。阿普唑仑选择性地且剂量依赖性地增加了习得过程中的错误百分比,而β-CCE仅在每个受试者测试的最高剂量下增加习得错误。相比之下,FG-7142和骆驼蓬碱在几乎消除反应的剂量下对错误百分比没有影响。在所有情况下,执行准确性通常不受影响。氟马西尼单独给药时剂量为0.1和0.32毫克/千克时几乎没有影响或偶尔降低反应率,剂量为1毫克/千克时,剂量依赖性地拮抗了β-CCE、FG-7142和阿普唑仑的降低反应率和增加错误的作用。相比之下,氟马西尼未能拮抗骆驼蓬碱的作用。因此,与正变构调节剂相比,负变构调节剂仅适度干扰习得,但两种类型调节剂的作用均被苯二氮䓬拮抗剂氟马西尼拮抗。