Lowman C, Allen J, Stout R L
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-7003, USA.
Addiction. 1996 Dec;91 Suppl:S51-71.
The Relapse Replication and Extension Project (RREP) was a multisite study to replicate and extend Marlatt's taxonomy of relapse precipitants. In addition to replicating Marlatt's original taxonomic system, three independent research teams utilized prospective designs to identify additional predictors of relapse and developed and evaluated two alternative systems for assessing high risk relapse situations. This overview describes the replication methodology, summarizes seven RREP studies completed by the three research groups, and discusses five cross-cutting conclusions emerging from the studies. These conclusions are: (1) reliability of Marlatt's taxonomic system was variable both within and across the three research sites; (2) Marlatt's taxonomic system showed little predictive validity in analyses that used pretreatment relapse data to predict post-treatment relapse, but there are important unresolved issues; (3) an alternative taxonomy provided little more predictive validity than the original taxonomy even though it measured more dimensions of relapse situations and provided greater analytic flexibility; (4) the Reasons for Drinking Questionnaire appeared to be a successful psychometric transformation of Marlatt's taxonomy, one which did demonstrate predictive validity; and (5) Marlatt's taxonomy was based on a time-intensive model of relapse prediction whereas RREP prospective analyses represented time-extensive models of relapse prediction. Coping responses are noted to be effective predictors of relapse under both models.
复发复制与扩展项目(RREP)是一项多地点研究,旨在复制并扩展马尔拉特的复发诱发因素分类法。除了复制马尔拉特的原始分类系统外,三个独立的研究团队采用前瞻性设计来确定复发的其他预测因素,并开发和评估了两种用于评估高风险复发情况的替代系统。本概述描述了复制方法,总结了三个研究小组完成的七项RREP研究,并讨论了这些研究得出的五个贯穿各领域的结论。这些结论是:(1)马尔拉特分类系统在三个研究地点内部和之间的可靠性存在差异;(2)在使用治疗前复发数据预测治疗后复发的分析中,马尔拉特分类系统几乎没有预测效度,但存在一些重要的未解决问题;(3)尽管一种替代分类法测量了更多复发情况维度并提供了更大的分析灵活性,但它的预测效度并不比原始分类法高多少;(4)饮酒原因问卷似乎是对马尔拉特分类法成功的心理测量学转换,确实显示出预测效度;(5)马尔拉特分类法基于复发预测的时间密集型模型,而RREP前瞻性分析代表了复发预测的时间扩展型模型。在两种模型下,应对反应都是复发的有效预测因素。