Maisto S A, Connors G J, Zywiak W H
Department of Psychology, Syracuse University, NY 13244-2353, USA.
Addiction. 1996 Dec;91 Suppl:S89-97.
Marlatt's typology of relapse precipitants has had a major influence on clinical research and practice in the substance use disorders. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the construct validity of the typology, which was done in several ways. First, precipitants of the relapse coded at the baseline assessment and for the first drink post-treatment admission were compared. In addition, baseline relapse precipitants were compared with the highest factor scores recorded in the baseline Inventory of Drinking Situations data. A third set of analyses concerned the relationship among Marlatt precipitant codes, psychiatric diagnoses, and Alcohol Dependence Scale scores. The subjects were 142 men and women who were recruited for this study upon their admission to inpatient or outpatient alcohol treatment programs. Participants completed a baseline assessment covering substance use, including information on the precipitants of a pretreatment "relapse", and other areas of functioning. Subjects then completed bimonthly follow-up assessments during the course of 1 year. The results showed support for only one of the predictions regarding the construct validity of the Marlatt typology. Possible explanations for these findings and their implications for clinical research and practice are discussed.
马尔拉特复吸诱发因素类型学对物质使用障碍的临床研究和实践产生了重大影响。本研究的目的是评估该类型学的结构效度,通过多种方式进行。首先,比较了在基线评估时编码的复吸诱发因素与治疗入院后首次饮酒时的诱发因素。此外,将基线复吸诱发因素与基线饮酒情境量表数据中记录的最高因子得分进行了比较。第三组分析涉及马尔拉特诱发因素编码、精神科诊断和酒精依赖量表得分之间的关系。研究对象为142名男性和女性,他们在入住住院或门诊酒精治疗项目时被招募参加本研究。参与者完成了涵盖物质使用的基线评估,包括关于治疗前“复吸”诱发因素的信息以及其他功能领域的信息。然后,受试者在1年的过程中每两个月完成一次随访评估。结果仅支持了关于马尔拉特类型学结构效度的其中一项预测。讨论了这些发现的可能解释及其对临床研究和实践的意义。