• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭构成、健康状况及社会支持联系对死亡率的影响。

The effects of family composition, health, and social support linkages on mortality.

作者信息

Rogers R G

机构信息

Population Program, University of Colorado, Boulder 80309-0484, USA.

出版信息

J Health Soc Behav. 1996 Dec;37(4):326-38.

PMID:8997888
Abstract

This study reveals how family living arrangements influence mortality. I use the National Health Interview Survey, Supplement on Aging, and discrete-time hazard rate models to show that some family arrangements result from strong social bonds, but others are a result of financial needs or health problems. In some instances, it is not family living arrangements that influence the risk of mortality but vice versa: The family rearranges itself to deal with ill health and disability among its members. The family strives to promote health, prevent disease, and encourage economic security. However, family members who endure economic or health hardships face increased risk of death.

摘要

本研究揭示了家庭居住安排如何影响死亡率。我利用《国家健康访谈调查》之《老龄化补充调查》以及离散时间风险率模型表明,一些家庭安排源于牢固的社会纽带,但其他安排则是经济需求或健康问题所致。在某些情况下,并非家庭居住安排影响死亡风险,而是相反:家庭会进行自我调整以应对家庭成员的健康不佳和残疾问题。家庭努力促进健康、预防疾病并鼓励经济保障。然而,遭受经济或健康困境的家庭成员面临更高的死亡风险。

相似文献

1
The effects of family composition, health, and social support linkages on mortality.家庭构成、健康状况及社会支持联系对死亡率的影响。
J Health Soc Behav. 1996 Dec;37(4):326-38.
2
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
3
A profile of children with disabilities receiving SSI: highlights from the National Survey of SSI Children and Families.领取补充保障收入的残疾儿童概况:来自全国补充保障收入儿童与家庭调查的要点
Soc Secur Bull. 2005;66(2):21-48.
4
Glaucoma and survival: the National Health Interview Survey 1986-1994.青光眼与生存率:1986 - 1994年美国国家健康访谈调查
Ophthalmology. 2003 Aug;110(8):1476-83. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00408-1.
5
A broader perspective on education and mortality: are we influenced by other people's education?关于教育与死亡率的更广阔视角:我们会受到他人教育程度的影响吗?
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Feb;66(3):620-36. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.10.009. Epub 2007 Nov 19.
6
[Preventive effect of social support on mortality among elderly population: a longitudinal study].[社会支持对老年人群死亡率的预防作用:一项纵向研究]
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2002 Nov-Dec;76(6):673-82.
7
Meeting the needs of parents around the time of diagnosis of disability among their children: evaluation of a novel program for information, support, and liaison by key workers.在孩子被诊断为残疾前后满足家长的需求:对一项由关键工作者提供信息、支持和联络的新项目的评估。
Pediatrics. 2004 Oct;114(4):e477-82. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0240.
8
Prophylactic Oophorectomy: Reducing the U.S. Death Rate from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. A Continuing Debate.预防性卵巢切除术:降低美国上皮性卵巢癌死亡率。一场持续的争论。
Oncologist. 1996;1(5):326-330.
9
Family support, living alone, and subjective health of a patient in connection with a coronary artery bypass surgery.冠状动脉搭桥手术患者的家庭支持、独居情况与主观健康状况
Heart Lung. 2006 Jul-Aug;35(4):234-44. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2005.11.002.
10
Influences of socio-demographic and social context risk factors on labor force aged mortality from communicable disease.
J Med Assoc Thai. 2006 Jun;89(6):854-63.

引用本文的文献

1
Structural disadvantages to the kin network from intergenerational racial health inequities.代际种族健康不平等给亲属网络带来的结构劣势。
Soc Forces. 2024 Sep;103(1):327-349. doi: 10.1093/sf/soae032. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
2
Voluntary work for the physical and mental health of older volunteers: A systematic review.为老年志愿者身心健康开展的志愿工作:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 23;16(4):e1124. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1124. eCollection 2020 Dec.
3
Association of intergenerational relationships with cognitive impairment among Chinese adults 80 years of age or older: prospective cohort study.
代际关系与 80 岁及以上中国成年人认知障碍的关联:前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Nov 7;22(1):838. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03529-y.
4
Family Health Development: A Theoretical Framework.家庭健康发展:理论框架。
Pediatrics. 2022 May 1;149(Suppl 5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2021-053509I.
5
Effect of family "upward" intergenerational support on the health of rural elderly in China: Evidence from Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey.家庭“向上”代际支持对中国农村老年人健康的影响:来自中国健康长寿纵向调查的证据。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 18;16(6):e0253131. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253131. eCollection 2021.
6
Benefits of Older Volunteering on Wellbeing: An International Comparison.老年志愿服务对幸福感的益处:一项国际比较。
Front Psychol. 2019 Dec 13;10:2647. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02647. eCollection 2019.
7
The Association between Social Support and Incident Dementia: A 10-Year Follow-Up Study in Japan.社会支持与痴呆事件之间的关联:日本的一项为期 10 年的随访研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jan 16;16(2):239. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16020239.
8
The gendered experience with respect to health-seeking behaviour in an urban slum of Kolkata, India.印度加尔各答一个城市贫民窟中与健康寻求行为相关的性别体验。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Feb 14;17(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0738-8.
9
A 10-Year Follow-Up Study of Social Ties and Functional Health among the Old: The AGES Project.老年人社交关系与功能健康的10年随访研究:AGES项目
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Jul 3;14(7):717. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14070717.
10
Complex Households and the Distribution of Multiple Resources in Later Life: Findings From a National Survey.复杂家庭与晚年多种资源的分配:一项全国性调查的结果
Res Aging. 2016 Feb;38(2):150-77. doi: 10.1177/0164027515581421. Epub 2015 Apr 21.