• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丈夫和妻子对前列腺癌筛查的偏好。

Preferences of husbands and wives for prostate cancer screening.

作者信息

Volk R J, Cantor S B, Spann S J, Cass A R, Cardenas M P, Warren M M

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, USA. bvolk%

出版信息

Arch Fam Med. 1997 Jan-Feb;6(1):72-6. doi: 10.1001/archfami.6.1.72.

DOI:10.1001/archfami.6.1.72
PMID:9003176
Abstract

The benefits of screening for prostate cancer are uncertain. Outcomes of treatment are particularly important to couples because they challenge the most intimate aspects of a couple's relationship. This study used clinical decision analysis to explore the preferences of 10 couples for prostate cancer screening. The decision-analytic model found that 7 of 10 husbands preferred the no screening strategy, while 9 of 10 wives preferred screening for their husbands. Wives associated little burden with complications of treatment, preferring to maximize their husbands' quantity of life regardless of complications. The issue of who is the decision maker is paramount in the case of prostate cancer screening. Optimal screening strategies may differ for husbands and wives. Guidelines for prostate cancer screening and management should consider assessing preferences on an individual couple basis.

摘要

前列腺癌筛查的益处尚不确定。治疗结果对夫妻双方尤为重要,因为它们挑战了夫妻关系中最私密的方面。本研究采用临床决策分析来探究10对夫妻对前列腺癌筛查的偏好。决策分析模型发现,10名丈夫中有7名倾向于不筛查策略,而10名妻子中有9名希望为丈夫进行筛查。妻子们认为治疗并发症带来的负担较小,更愿意不顾并发症来最大化丈夫的生命质量。在前列腺癌筛查的情况下,谁是决策者这一问题至关重要。丈夫和妻子的最佳筛查策略可能不同。前列腺癌筛查和管理指南应考虑在个体夫妻的基础上评估偏好。

相似文献

1
Preferences of husbands and wives for prostate cancer screening.丈夫和妻子对前列腺癌筛查的偏好。
Arch Fam Med. 1997 Jan-Feb;6(1):72-6. doi: 10.1001/archfami.6.1.72.
2
Concordance of couples' prostate cancer screening recommendations from a decision analysis.决策分析中夫妇前列腺癌筛查推荐的一致性。
Patient. 2008 Jan 1;1(1):11-9. doi: 10.2165/01312067-200801010-00004.
3
Preferences of husbands and wives for outcomes of prostate cancer screening and treatment.丈夫和妻子对前列腺癌筛查及治疗结果的偏好。
J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Apr;19(4):339-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30046.x.
4
Whose life is it anyway?
Arch Fam Med. 1997 Jan-Feb;6(1):77-8. doi: 10.1001/archfami.6.1.77.
5
Do husbands and wives agree on prostate cancer screening?
J Fam Pract. 1997 May;44(5):443-4.
6
Social support and adjustment among wives of men with prostate cancer.前列腺癌患者妻子的社会支持和适应
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2014;32(1):16-36. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2013.855962.
7
Marriage work in older couples: Disclosure of marital problems to spouses and friends over time.老年夫妇的婚姻问题:随着时间推移向配偶和朋友透露婚姻问题。
J Fam Psychol. 2015 Oct;29(5):732-43. doi: 10.1037/fam0000099. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
8
From "death sentence" to "good cancer": couples' transformation of a prostate cancer diagnosis.从“死刑判决”到“幸运的癌症”:夫妻对前列腺癌诊断的转变
Nurs Res. 2002 Nov-Dec;51(6):391-7. doi: 10.1097/00006199-200211000-00007.
9
Communication about prostate cancer between men and their wives.男性与其妻子之间关于前列腺癌的交流。
J Fam Pract. 2001 Mar;50(3):226-31.
10
Prostate cancer screening: a decision analysis.前列腺癌筛查:一项决策分析。
J Fam Pract. 1995 Jul;41(1):33-41.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of the influence of marital status on prognosis of prostate cancer patients based on big data.基于大数据分析婚姻状况对前列腺癌患者预后的影响
Am J Clin Exp Urol. 2022 Oct 15;10(5):320-326. eCollection 2022.
2
Use of forecasted assessment of quality of life to validate time-trade-off utilities and a prostate cancer screening decision-analytic model.使用生活质量的预测评估来验证时间权衡效用和前列腺癌筛查决策分析模型。
Health Expect. 2015 Oct;18(5):1610-20. doi: 10.1111/hex.12150. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
3
Concordance of couples' prostate cancer screening recommendations from a decision analysis.
决策分析中夫妇前列腺癌筛查推荐的一致性。
Patient. 2008 Jan 1;1(1):11-9. doi: 10.2165/01312067-200801010-00004.
4
Men's and carers' experiences of care for prostate cancer: a narrative literature review.男性及护理者对前列腺癌护理的体验:一项叙述性文献综述
Health Expect. 2009 Sep;12(3):301-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00546.x.
5
QALYs: are they helpful to decision makers?质量调整生命年:它们对决策者有帮助吗?
Pharmacoeconomics. 2006;24(10):947-52. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200624100-00002.
6
The impact of a suspicious prostate biopsy on patients' psychological, socio-behavioral, and medical care outcomes.可疑前列腺活检对患者心理、社会行为及医疗护理结局的影响。
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Jul;21(7):715-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00464.x.
7
Awareness and use of the prostate-specific antigen test among African-American men.非裔美国男性对前列腺特异性抗原检测的知晓与使用情况。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2005 Jul;97(7):963-71.
8
Preferences of husbands and wives for outcomes of prostate cancer screening and treatment.丈夫和妻子对前列腺癌筛查及治疗结果的偏好。
J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Apr;19(4):339-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30046.x.
9
Validity and feasibility of the use of condition-specific outcome measures in economic evaluation.在经济评估中使用特定疾病结局指标的有效性和可行性。
Qual Life Res. 2003 Jun;12(4):363-71. doi: 10.1023/a:1023453405252.
10
Cost-utility analysis: use QALYs only with great caution.成本效用分析:仅在极为谨慎的情况下使用质量调整生命年(QALYs)。
CMAJ. 2003 Feb 18;168(4):433-4.