• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用Cox模型分析随机试验时协变量遗漏和分类的影响。

Effects of covariate omission and categorization when analysing randomized trials with the Cox model.

作者信息

Schmoor C, Schumacher M

机构信息

Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

Stat Med. 1997;16(1-3):225-37. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19970215)16:3<225::aid-sim482>3.0.co;2-c.

DOI:10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19970215)16:3<225::aid-sim482>3.0.co;2-c
PMID:9004394
Abstract

When analysing the survival of patients in comparative randomized clinical trials using the Cox proportional hazards model, important prognostic factors may be included for the adjustment of the treatment effect. In this paper we examine two of the most common misspecifications of the model: (i) an important prognostic factor is omitted from the analysis; and (ii) an important prognostic factor originally present on continuous scale is included in categorized form. Both situations may emerge from the occurrence of missing values. We investigate the properties of the maximum partial likelihood estimator of the treatment effect under this kind of misspecification. The estimate of the treatment effect is found to be asymptotically biased toward zero. For its asymptotic variance we obtain a quantity with the so-called 'sandwich' structure. Thus, variance estimation by the inverse of the second-order derivative of the likelihood is not consistent. The magnitude of overestimation or underestimation is evaluated numerically for specific settings. The precision of the treatment effect estimate under covariate omission or categorization is compared with the precision of the estimate in the correct and not misspecified model. It turns out that correct adjustment does not lead to a higher precision of the treatment effect estimate, but due to the resulting underestimation, covariate omission or categorization lead to loss of power of the test of no treatment effect.

摘要

在使用Cox比例风险模型分析比较随机临床试验中患者的生存情况时,可能会纳入重要的预后因素以调整治疗效果。在本文中,我们研究了该模型最常见的两种错误设定:(i)分析中遗漏了一个重要的预后因素;(ii)原本以连续尺度呈现的一个重要预后因素以分类形式纳入。这两种情况都可能因缺失值的出现而产生。我们研究了在这种错误设定下治疗效果的最大偏似然估计量的性质。发现治疗效果的估计值在渐近意义上偏向于零。对于其渐近方差,我们得到了一个具有所谓“三明治”结构的量。因此,通过似然函数二阶导数的逆来进行方差估计是不一致的。针对特定设置,对高估或低估的程度进行了数值评估。将协变量遗漏或分类情况下治疗效果估计的精度与正确且未错误设定模型中估计的精度进行了比较。结果表明,正确的调整并不会导致治疗效果估计具有更高的精度,但由于由此产生的低估,协变量遗漏或分类会导致无治疗效果检验的功效丧失。

相似文献

1
Effects of covariate omission and categorization when analysing randomized trials with the Cox model.使用Cox模型分析随机试验时协变量遗漏和分类的影响。
Stat Med. 1997;16(1-3):225-37. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19970215)16:3<225::aid-sim482>3.0.co;2-c.
2
Estimation of treatment effects based on possibly misspecified Cox regression.基于可能错误设定的Cox回归的治疗效果估计。
Lifetime Data Anal. 2012 Oct;18(4):408-33. doi: 10.1007/s10985-012-9222-8. Epub 2012 Apr 21.
3
Choice of parametric accelerated life and proportional hazards models for survival data: asymptotic results.生存数据的参数加速寿命模型和比例风险模型的选择:渐近结果
Lifetime Data Anal. 2002 Dec;8(4):375-93. doi: 10.1023/a:1020570922072.
4
Empirical efficiency maximization: improved locally efficient covariate adjustment in randomized experiments and survival analysis.经验效率最大化:随机试验和生存分析中改进的局部有效协变量调整
Int J Biostat. 2008;4(1):Article 5.
5
Properties of proportional-hazards score tests under misspecified regression models.错误设定回归模型下比例风险评分检验的性质。
Biometrics. 1984 Dec;40(4):1037-48.
6
Restricted mean survival time: Does covariate adjustment improve precision in randomized clinical trials?受限平均生存时间:协变量调整能否提高随机临床试验的精度?
Clin Trials. 2018 Apr;15(2):178-188. doi: 10.1177/1740774518759281. Epub 2018 Mar 4.
7
Improved precision in the analysis of randomized trials with survival outcomes, without assuming proportional hazards.在不假设风险比例的情况下,提高对具有生存结局的随机试验分析的精度。
Lifetime Data Anal. 2019 Jul;25(3):439-468. doi: 10.1007/s10985-018-9428-5. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
8
Model misspecification and robustness in causal inference: comparing matching with doubly robust estimation.因果推断中的模型误设定与稳健性:比较匹配法和双重稳健估计。
Stat Med. 2012 Jul 10;31(15):1572-81. doi: 10.1002/sim.4496. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
9
Effect of covariate omission in Weibull accelerated failure time model: a caution.
Biom J. 2014 Nov;56(6):991-1000. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201300006. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
10
Bias and sensitivity analysis when estimating treatment effects from the cox model with omitted covariates.在使用含遗漏协变量的Cox模型估计治疗效果时的偏倚和敏感性分析。
Biometrics. 2013 Dec;69(4):850-60. doi: 10.1111/biom.12096. Epub 2013 Nov 13.

引用本文的文献

1
CD276 as a critical independent biomarker and immune checkpoint inhibitor target in epithelioid mesothelioma-TCGA study.CD276作为上皮样间皮瘤的关键独立生物标志物和免疫检查点抑制剂靶点——TCGA研究
J Thorac Dis. 2025 Jan 24;17(1):109-120. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-1598. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
2
Marginal hazard ratio estimates in joint frailty models for heart failure trials.心力衰竭试验联合脆弱性模型中的边际风险比估计值。
Biom J. 2019 Nov;61(6):1385-1401. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201800133. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
3
Unobserved Heterogeneity of Frailty in the Analysis of Socioeconomic Differences in Health and Mortality.
健康与死亡率社会经济差异分析中虚弱的未观察到的异质性。
Eur J Popul. 2016 Jan 25;32(1):55-72. doi: 10.1007/s10680-015-9361-1. eCollection 2016 Feb.
4
Investigation of one-stage meta-analysis methods for joint longitudinal and time-to-event data through simulation and real data application.通过模拟和真实数据应用研究联合纵向和生存时间数据的单阶段荟萃分析方法。
Stat Med. 2019 Jan 30;38(2):247-268. doi: 10.1002/sim.7961. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
5
Investigation of 2-stage meta-analysis methods for joint longitudinal and time-to-event data through simulation and real data application.通过模拟和真实数据应用研究联合纵向和生存数据的 2 阶段荟萃分析方法。
Stat Med. 2018 Apr 15;37(8):1227-1244. doi: 10.1002/sim.7585. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
6
A DAG-based comparison of interventional effect underestimation between composite endpoint and multi-state analysis in cardiovascular trials.基于有向无环图的心血管试验中复合终点与多状态分析之间干预效果低估的比较。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Jul 4;17(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0366-9.
7
A comparison of methods to adjust for continuous covariates in the analysis of randomised trials.随机试验分析中连续协变量调整方法的比较
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Apr 11;16:42. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0141-3.
8
The Covariance Adjustment Approaches for Combining Incomparable Cox Regressions Caused by Unbalanced Covariates Adjustment: A Multivariate Meta-Analysis Study.用于合并由不均衡协变量调整导致的不可比Cox回归的协方差调整方法:一项多变量荟萃分析研究。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2015;2015:801031. doi: 10.1155/2015/801031. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
9
Prevention of depression in at-risk adolescents: longer-term effects.预防高危青少年抑郁:长期效果。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2013 Nov;70(11):1161-70. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.295.
10
Mortality by education level at late-adult ages in Turin: a survival analysis using frailty models with period and cohort approaches.都灵地区成年人后期教育水平与死亡率:使用脆弱模型的生存分析,结合时期和队列方法。
BMJ Open. 2013 Jul 3;3(7). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002841. Print 2013.