Perry J R, Szalai J P, Norris J W
Division of Neurology, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, University of Toronto, Ontario.
Arch Neurol. 1997 Jan;54(1):25-8. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1997.00550130015009.
Despite several randomized controlled trials, the role of carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic patients is controversial. Validated evidence-based guidelines are needed.
Thirty-five members of the Canadian Stroke Consortium, an independent body of cerebrovascular disease experts, reviewed evidence-based guidelines developed by the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. We held 3 rounds of Delphi consensus to solicit opinion and agreement.
We found a high level of interrater agreement for all guidelines using multiple statistical measures. Members agreed that evidence is insufficient to endorse carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic patients with angiographically proven stenosis of more than 60% (kappa = 0.70, P < .01). Reasons cited included concern over the reproducibility of low surgical morbidity rates in the community at large, the questionable clinical benefit conferred by surgery, and the lack of proven reduction in the risk of major disabling stroke. Screening the general population for asymptomatic stenosis was unanimously rejected. Also, screening even patients with risk factors or proven atherosclerosis at other sites was not endorsed (kappa = 0.91 and kappa = 0.79, respectively, both P < .01).
There is insufficient evidence to recommend carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic patients. Evidence is also insufficient to endorse a screening strategy even for patients with risk factors for carotid disease. While stroke prevention remains a critical goal, we do not recommend that it be accomplished by screening or by performing carotid surgery in asymptomatic patients.
尽管有多项随机对照试验,但颈动脉内膜切除术对无症状患者的作用仍存在争议。因此需要经过验证的循证指南。
加拿大卒中联盟的35名成员(一个由脑血管疾病专家组成的独立团体)对加拿大定期健康检查特别工作组制定的循证指南进行了审查。我们进行了三轮德尔菲共识调查以征求意见并达成共识。
我们使用多种统计方法发现所有指南的评分者间一致性水平较高。成员们一致认为,对于血管造影证实狭窄超过60%的无症状患者,证据不足以支持进行颈动脉内膜切除术(kappa = 0.70,P <.01)。提出的理由包括担心在广大社区中低手术发病率的可重复性、手术带来的可疑临床益处,以及缺乏确凿证据表明能降低严重致残性卒中的风险。一致拒绝了对普通人群进行无症状狭窄筛查。此外,也不支持对有危险因素或在其他部位已证实有动脉粥样硬化的患者进行筛查(kappa分别为0.91和0.79,均P <.01)。
没有足够的证据推荐对无症状患者进行颈动脉内膜切除术。即使对于有颈动脉疾病危险因素的患者,也没有足够的证据支持筛查策略。虽然预防卒中仍然是一个关键目标,但我们不建议通过筛查或对无症状患者进行颈动脉手术来实现这一目标。