• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

正常驾驶时头枕位置:对追尾事故中颈部受伤风险的影响。

Headrest position during normal driving: implication to neck injury risk in rear crashes.

作者信息

Viano D C, Gargan M F

机构信息

Research and Development Center, General Motors Corporation, Warren, MI, USA.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 1996 Nov;28(6):665-74. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(96)00011-5.

DOI:10.1016/s0001-4575(96)00011-5
PMID:9006635
Abstract

The gap and relative height of headrest behind drivers were determined for 1915 vehicles approaching an intersection on a two lane road. Vehicle type and headrest adjustment were also evaluated using film of normal driving taken by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. Only 10% of drivers had headrests in the most favorable position to prevent neck extension during a rearend crash. 73% of cars had adjustable headrests, but only a quarter were placed in the up position. 83% of the adjustable headrests could have been raised to better protect the driver. Hyge sled tests were run to determine biomechanical responses for the various conditions observed in normal driving. This included three headrest heights and three gaps behind the head. Neck extension from the Hybrid III dummy was normalized to the response for a high, close headrest, and injury risk was assumed to be proportional to neck extension. The current driving situation has a relative injury risk of 3.4 in rearend crashes, compared to 1.0 for the favorable condition. If all adjustable headrests were placed in the up position, the relative risk would be lowered to 2.4, a 28.3% reduction in whiplash injury risk. Public education and vehicle design should address the importance of proper headrest placement for driving safety.

摘要

对1915辆在双车道道路上接近十字路口的车辆,测定了驾驶员后方头枕的间隙和相对高度。还利用美国公路安全保险协会拍摄的正常驾驶影片,对车辆类型和头枕调节情况进行了评估。在追尾碰撞中,只有10%的驾驶员的头枕处于最有利于防止颈部伸展的位置。73%的汽车配备了可调节头枕,但只有四分之一处于升起位置。83%的可调节头枕本可以升高以更好地保护驾驶员。进行了Hyge雪橇试验,以确定在正常驾驶中观察到的各种情况下的生物力学反应。这包括三种头枕高度和头部后方的三种间隙。将Hybrid III假人的颈部伸展情况与高且靠近的头枕的反应进行归一化处理,并假定受伤风险与颈部伸展成正比。与有利条件下的1.0相比,当前驾驶情况在追尾碰撞中的相对受伤风险为3.4。如果所有可调节头枕都处于升起位置,相对风险将降至2.4,鞭打损伤风险降低28.3%。公众教育和车辆设计应关注正确放置头枕对驾驶安全的重要性。

相似文献

1
Headrest position during normal driving: implication to neck injury risk in rear crashes.正常驾驶时头枕位置:对追尾事故中颈部受伤风险的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 1996 Nov;28(6):665-74. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(96)00011-5.
2
Average male and female virtual dummy model (BioRID and EvaRID) simulations with two seat concepts in the Euro NCAP low severity rear impact test configuration.采用 Euro NCAP 低严重度后碰撞测试配置中的两种座椅概念,对男性和女性虚拟假人模型(BioRID 和 EvaRID)进行平均模拟。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 May;114:62-70. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.05.029. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
3
Effect of wheelchair headrest use on pediatric head and neck injury risk outcomes during rear impact.后碰撞期间使用轮椅头枕对儿童头部和颈部损伤风险结果的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2008 Jul;40(4):1595-603. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2008.04.007. Epub 2008 May 19.
4
Does knowledge of seat design and whiplash injury mechanisms translate to understanding outcomes?座椅设计和挥鞭伤机制方面的知识是否能转化为对结果的理解?
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Dec 1;36(25 Suppl):S187-93. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182387eff.
5
Cervical spine curvature during simulated rear crashes with energy-absorbing seat.模拟后碰撞中使用吸能座椅时的颈椎曲度
Spine J. 2011 Mar;11(3):224-33. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.01.025.
6
An energy-absorbing sliding seat for reducing neck injury risks in rear impact--analysis for prototype built.一种用于降低追尾事故中颈部受伤风险的能量吸收式滑动座椅——已制造原型的分析
Traffic Inj Prev. 2016;17(3):313-9. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1064908. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
7
Report investigating the importance of head restraint positioning in reducing neck injury in rear impact.关于调查头枕位置在减少后部碰撞中颈部损伤方面重要性的报告。
Accid Anal Prev. 2000 Mar;32(2):299-305. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(99)00127-x.
8
Effects of head restraint and seat redesign on neck injury risk in rear-end crashes.头部保护装置和座椅重新设计对追尾碰撞中颈部受伤风险的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2003 Jun;4(2):83-90. doi: 10.1080/15389580309867.
9
Real-world adjustments of driver seat and head restraint in Saab 9-3 vehicles.萨博9-3汽车驾驶员座椅和头枕的实际调整情况。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2017 May 19;18(4):398-405. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2016.1217522. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
10
[Automobile head supports--adjustment possibilities and utilization. Results of a field study].[汽车头枕——调节可能性与使用情况。一项实地研究的结果]
Unfallchirurg. 1997 Jul;100(7):561-7. doi: 10.1007/s001130050158.

引用本文的文献

1
Driving position field study, differences with the whiplash protocol and biomechanics experimental responses.驾驶位置实地研究、与挥鞭样损伤协议的差异及生物力学实验反应
Ann Adv Automot Med. 2011;55:71-9.
2
Delayed-onset post-traumatic headache after a motor vehicle collision: a case report.机动车碰撞后迟发性创伤后头痛:一例报告
J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2007 Jun;51(2):83-90.
3
Knowledge and application of correct car seat head restraint usage among chiropractic college interns: a cross-sectional study.脊椎按摩疗法学院实习生对正确使用汽车座椅头枕的知识与应用:一项横断面研究。
J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2005 Mar;49(1):32-9.
4
Assessing automobile head restraint positioning in Portland, Oregon.评估俄勒冈州波特兰市汽车头枕的位置。
Inj Prev. 2005 Apr;11(2):97-101. doi: 10.1136/ip.2004.006122.
5
Whiplash associated disorders: a review of the literature to guide patient information and advice.挥鞭样相关疾病:文献综述以指导患者信息与建议
Emerg Med J. 2002 Nov;19(6):499-506. doi: 10.1136/emj.19.6.499.
6
Human factors in the causation of road traffic crashes.道路交通事故成因中的人为因素。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2000;16(9):819-26. doi: 10.1023/a:1007649804201.
7
Driver distance from the steering wheel: perception and objective measurement.驾驶员与方向盘的距离:感知与客观测量。
Am J Public Health. 1999 Jul;89(7):1109-11. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.7.1109.