Walstra G J, Teunisse S, van Gool W A, van Crevel H
Department of Neurology, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Neurol. 1997 Jan;244(1):17-22. doi: 10.1007/pl00007724.
Dementia has a reversible cause in some cases, and these should be diagnosed without over-investigating the many patients with irreversible disease. We prospectively studied the prevalence of reversible dementia in a memory clinic, determined the added value of investigations compared with clinical examination and assessed the outcome of treatment of potentially reversible causes by measuring (1) cognition, (2) disability in daily functioning, (3) behavioural changes and (4) caregiver burden. Two hundred patients aged 65 years and over were examined, using the CAMDEX-N. If they were demented, the probable cause was diagnosed clinically and confirmed or excluded by a standard set of investigations, which were done in all patients. Of the patients, 170 (mean age 79.2 years) were demented; 31 were treated for potentially reversible causes. At follow-up after 6 months, no patients showed complete reversal of dementia. Five patients improved on clinical impression, but only one on clinical measurement. Thirty patients were cognitively impaired, but not demented; seven were treated. Judged clinically, three patients improved, but on assessment only one did so; she recovered completely. Blood tests often produced diagnostic results that were not expected clinically, but electroencephalography and computed tomography of the brain did not. None of the investigations had an effect on outcome of dementia after treatment. We conclude that in elderly patients referred to a memory clinic, the prevalence of reversible dementia is of the order of 1%, if outcome after treatment is assessed by a standardized measurement. We recommend blood tests in all patients, to detect not only metabolic causes of dementia but also co-morbidity possibly worsening the dementia. Other investigations can be performed on clinical indication. Clinical evaluation remains the mainstay of diagnosis in dementia.
在某些情况下,痴呆症有可逆转的病因,应对这些情况进行诊断,而不应过度检查众多患有不可逆转疾病的患者。我们对一家记忆诊所中可逆转痴呆症的患病率进行了前瞻性研究,确定了与临床检查相比各项检查的附加价值,并通过测量(1)认知、(2)日常功能障碍、(3)行为变化和(4)照料者负担来评估潜在可逆转病因的治疗结果。使用剑桥老年人精神状态检查表(CAMDEX-N)对200名65岁及以上的患者进行了检查。如果他们患有痴呆症,则通过临床诊断可能病因,并通过一套标准检查进行确认或排除,所有患者均进行了这些检查。在这些患者中,170名(平均年龄79.2岁)患有痴呆症;31名因潜在可逆转病因接受了治疗。6个月后随访时,没有患者的痴呆症完全逆转。5名患者临床症状有所改善,但经临床测量仅有1名改善。30名患者存在认知障碍但未患痴呆症;7名接受了治疗。从临床判断,3名患者有所改善,但经评估仅有1名如此;她完全康复。血液检查常常得出临床上未预期的诊断结果,但脑电图和脑部计算机断层扫描则不然。治疗后,没有任何一项检查对痴呆症的结果产生影响。我们得出结论,在转诊至记忆诊所的老年患者中,如果通过标准化测量评估治疗结果,可逆转痴呆症的患病率约为1%。我们建议对所有患者进行血液检查,不仅用于检测痴呆症的代谢病因,还用于检测可能使痴呆症恶化的合并症。可根据临床指征进行其他检查。临床评估仍然是痴呆症诊断的主要依据。