Suppr超能文献

[Left bundle branch block analysis by body surface mapping. Comparison with electrocardiographic and vectocardiographic findings].

作者信息

Pastore C A, Moffa P J, Tobias N M, de Moraes A P, Kaiser E, Cuoco M A, Mansur A, Granado G, Sanchez M del C, Bellotti G, Pileggi F

机构信息

Instituto do Coração do Hospital das Clínicas, FMUSP.

出版信息

Arq Bras Cardiol. 1996 May;66(5):253-6.

PMID:9008906
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the correlation between the departure areas (DA), negative or positive, in patients whose electrocardiogram showed left bundle branch block (LBBB) and association with left ventricular hipertrophy (LVH) and myocardial infarction (MI), to the electrocardiographic (ECG) and vectocardiographic (VCG) classic criteria.

METHODS

The study was carried out with 46 patients (27 males) with LBBB. These patients had hypertension (19.5%), coronary heart disease (34.7%) and 21 patients with no heart disease (45.8%).

RESULTS

The statistic analysis using the Cluster method divided the patients in two groups. Group I (22 patients) showed an average rate for the DA (-2 SD) of 1091 for QRS and of 640 for ST-T. For the DA (+2 SD), the average rate was 618 for QRS and 881 for ST-T; group II (24 patients) showed an averaged for the DA (-2 SD) of 1063 for QRS and of 225 for ST-T. For the DA (+2 SD), the averaged rate was 428 for QRS and 600 for ST-T.

CONCLUSION

In general the current ECG/VCG findings, can not differentiate the presence of the association of LBBB to LVH and MI. The DA of ST-T, mainly negative was the most efficient to separate the two groups and help in the differential diagnosis.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验