• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

执行认知过程与多任务表现的计算理论:第一部分。基本机制。

A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms.

作者信息

Meyer D E, Kieras D E

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109-1109, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Rev. 1997 Jan;104(1):3-65. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.104.1.3.

DOI:10.1037/0033-295x.104.1.3
PMID:9009880
Abstract

A new theoretical framework, executive-process interactive control (EPIC), is introduced for characterizing human performance of concurrent perceptual-motor and cognitive tasks. On the basis of EPIC, computational models may be formulated to simulate multiple-task performance under a variety of circumstances. These models account well for reaction-time data from representative situations such as the psychological refractory-period procedure. EPIC's goodness of fit supports several key conclusions: (a) At a cognitive level, people can apply distinct sets of production rules simultaneously for executing the procedures of multiple tasks; (b) people's capacity to process information at "peripheral" perceptual-motor levels is limited; (c) to cope with such limits and to satisfy task priorities, flexible scheduling strategies are used; and (d) these strategies are mediated by executive cognitive processes that coordinate concurrent tasks adaptively.

摘要

引入了一个新的理论框架——执行过程交互控制(EPIC),用于描述人类在同时进行感知运动和认知任务时的表现。基于EPIC,可以构建计算模型来模拟各种情况下的多任务表现。这些模型能够很好地解释来自代表性情境(如心理不应期程序)的反应时间数据。EPIC的拟合优度支持了几个关键结论:(a)在认知层面,人们可以同时应用不同的生产规则集来执行多个任务的程序;(b)人们在“外周”感知运动层面处理信息的能力是有限的;(c)为了应对这些限制并满足任务优先级,会使用灵活的调度策略;(d)这些策略由执行认知过程介导,这些过程能自适应地协调并发任务。

相似文献

1
A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms.执行认知过程与多任务表现的计算理论:第一部分。基本机制。
Psychol Rev. 1997 Jan;104(1):3-65. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.104.1.3.
2
Serial modules in parallel: the psychological refractory period and perfect time-sharing.并行中的串行模块:心理不应期与完美时间共享
Psychol Rev. 2001 Oct;108(4):847-69. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.108.4.847.
3
Rational adaptation under task and processing constraints: implications for testing theories of cognition and action.任务与加工限制下的合理适应:对认知与行动理论测试的启示
Psychol Rev. 2009 Oct;116(4):717-51. doi: 10.1037/a0017187.
4
Virtually perfect time sharing in dual-task performance: uncorking the central cognitive bottleneck.双任务执行中近乎完美的时间共享:突破中央认知瓶颈
Psychol Sci. 2001 Mar;12(2):101-8. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00318.
5
Introspective reports of reaction times in dual-tasks reflect experienced difficulty rather than timing of cognitive processes.双重任务中反应时间的内省报告反映的是体验到的困难,而非认知过程的时间安排。
Conscious Cogn. 2014 Jul;27:254-67. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.05.011. Epub 2014 Jun 21.
6
How two share two tasks: evidence of a social psychological refractory period effect.两人如何分担两项任务:社会心理不应期效应的证据。
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Jun;211(3-4):387-96. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2703-2. Epub 2011 May 5.
7
Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations.双重任务情境下视觉注意的执行控制
Psychol Rev. 2001 Apr;108(2):393-434. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.108.2.393.
8
A cognitive framework for explaining serial processing and sequence execution strategies.一种用于解释串行处理和序列执行策略的认知框架。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Feb;22(1):54-77. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0773-4.
9
Queuing network modeling of the psychological refractory period (PRP).心理不应期(PRP)的排队网络建模
Psychol Rev. 2008 Oct;115(4):913-54. doi: 10.1037/a0013123.
10
Motor-cognitive dual-task performance: effects of a concurrent motor task on distinct components of visual processing capacity.运动认知双重任务表现:同时进行的运动任务对视觉处理能力不同组成部分的影响。
Psychol Res. 2018 Jan;82(1):177-185. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0951-x. Epub 2017 Dec 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Practice reshapes the geometry and dynamics of task-tailored representations.实践重塑了任务定制表征的几何结构和动态特性。
Cereb Cortex. 2025 Aug 1;35(8). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhaf125.
2
When boosting preparation sets older adults free from central bottlenecking: Evidence for dual-task automaticity.当增强准备集使老年人摆脱中枢瓶颈效应时:双重任务自动化的证据。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 Jul 25. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03133-3.
3
Exploring GVS as a display modality: cutaneous sensations and cue association maintenance.探索重力矢量刺激(GVS)作为一种显示方式:皮肤感觉和线索关联维持。
Exp Brain Res. 2025 Mar 21;243(4):97. doi: 10.1007/s00221-025-07058-z.
4
What Task Feature Determines the Dominant Task in Dual-Task Conditions?在双任务条件下,是什么任务特征决定了主导任务?
eNeuro. 2025 Mar 27;12(3). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0542-24.2025. Print 2025 Mar.
5
Sequential adjustments of task-pair control in dual-task contexts: Examining the role of repetition priming effects at the level of task-pair sets and abstract control states.双任务情境中任务对控制的顺序调整:在任务对集和抽象控制状态层面考察重复启动效应的作用。
Mem Cognit. 2025 Feb 18. doi: 10.3758/s13421-025-01694-0.
6
Multi-tasking costs in triple-task performance despite dual-task preparation.尽管进行了双任务准备,但三任务执行中的多任务成本依然存在。
Mem Cognit. 2025 Jan 28. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01674-w.
7
One- or two-step? New insights into two-step hypothesis and rainbow-like theory for pitch class-color synesthesia.一步还是两步?关于音级-颜色联觉的两步假说和彩虹般理论的新见解。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jan 10;15:1482714. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1482714. eCollection 2024.
8
Cognitive Control.认知控制
Annu Rev Psychol. 2025 Jan;76(1):167-195. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-022024-103901. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
9
Practice Reshapes the Geometry and Dynamics of Task-tailored Representations.实践重塑了任务定制表征的几何结构和动态变化。
bioRxiv. 2024 Sep 15:2024.09.12.612718. doi: 10.1101/2024.09.12.612718.
10
Directional information flow analysis in memory retrieval: a comparison between exaggerated and normal pictures.记忆检索中的定向信息流分析:夸张图片与正常图片的比较
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2025 Jan;63(1):89-100. doi: 10.1007/s11517-024-03179-9. Epub 2024 Aug 14.