• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

并行中的串行模块:心理不应期与完美时间共享

Serial modules in parallel: the psychological refractory period and perfect time-sharing.

作者信息

Byrne M D, Anderson J R

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Rice University, MS-25, 6100 Main Street, Houston, Texas 77005-1892, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Rev. 2001 Oct;108(4):847-69. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.108.4.847.

DOI:10.1037/0033-295x.108.4.847
PMID:11699122
Abstract

The authors describe ACT-R/perceptual-motor (ACT-R/PM), an integrated theory of cognition, perception, and action that consists of the ACT-R production system and a set of perceptual-motor modules. Each module (including cognition) is essentially serial, but modules run in parallel with one another. ACT-R/PM can model simple dual tasks such as the psychological refractory period (PRP), including subtle results previously explained with executive process interactive control (EPIC, D. E. Meyer & D. E. Kieras, 1997a). The central difference between the theories is that EPIC's productions can fire in parallel, whereas in ACT-R/PM, they are serial. Results from three PRP-like experiments with more demanding cognitive requirements indicate that cognitive processing for the 2 tasks need not overlap. ACT-R's activation-based retrieval processes are critical in accounting for the timing of these tasks and for explaining the dual-task performance decrement.

摘要

作者们描述了ACT-R/感知运动(ACT-R/PM),这是一种关于认知、感知和行动的综合理论,它由ACT-R产生系统和一组感知运动模块组成。每个模块(包括认知)本质上是串行的,但模块之间相互并行运行。ACT-R/PM可以对简单的双重任务进行建模,比如心理不应期(PRP),包括先前用执行过程交互控制(EPIC,D. E. 迈耶和D. E. 基拉斯,1997a)解释的细微结果。这些理论之间的核心差异在于,EPIC的产生式可以并行触发,而在ACT-R/PM中,它们是串行的。来自三个具有更高认知要求的类似PRP实验的结果表明,这两项任务的认知处理不需要重叠。ACT-R基于激活的检索过程对于解释这些任务的时间安排以及说明双重任务的表现下降至关重要。

相似文献

1
Serial modules in parallel: the psychological refractory period and perfect time-sharing.并行中的串行模块:心理不应期与完美时间共享
Psychol Rev. 2001 Oct;108(4):847-69. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.108.4.847.
2
A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms.执行认知过程与多任务表现的计算理论:第一部分。基本机制。
Psychol Rev. 1997 Jan;104(1):3-65. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.104.1.3.
3
Virtually no evidence for virtually perfect time-sharing.几乎没有证据表明存在几乎完美的时间共享。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2004 Oct;30(5):795-810. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.5.795.
4
Simultaneous dual-task performance reveals parallel response selection after practice.同时进行的双任务表现揭示了练习后的并行反应选择。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2002 Jun;28(3):527-45.
5
Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: implications for response selection.刺激-反应兼容性与心理不应期效应:对反应选择的启示
Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Jun;9(2):212-38. doi: 10.3758/bf03196277.
6
Queuing network modeling of the psychological refractory period (PRP).心理不应期(PRP)的排队网络建模
Psychol Rev. 2008 Oct;115(4):913-54. doi: 10.1037/a0013123.
7
Rational adaptation under task and processing constraints: implications for testing theories of cognition and action.任务与加工限制下的合理适应:对认知与行动理论测试的启示
Psychol Rev. 2009 Oct;116(4):717-51. doi: 10.1037/a0017187.
8
How two share two tasks: evidence of a social psychological refractory period effect.两人如何分担两项任务:社会心理不应期效应的证据。
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Jun;211(3-4):387-96. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2703-2. Epub 2011 May 5.
9
Parallel and serial task processing in the PRP paradigm: a drift-diffusion model approach.PRP 范式中的并行和串行任务处理:漂移-扩散模型方法。
Psychol Res. 2021 Jun;85(4):1529-1552. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01337-w. Epub 2020 Apr 25.
10
All-or-none bottleneck versus capacity sharing accounts of the psychological refractory period phenomenon.心理不应期现象的全或无瓶颈理论与容量共享理论
Psychol Res. 2002 Nov;66(4):274-86. doi: 10.1007/s00426-002-0101-x. Epub 2002 Sep 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Practice effects on dual-task order coordination and its sequential adjustment.双任务顺序协调及其顺序调整中的练习效应。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Oct;31(5):2189-2204. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02476-6. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
2
Cognitive control and meta-control in dual-task coordination.双重任务协调中的认知控制和元控制。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Aug;31(4):1445-1460. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02427-7. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
3
A Computational Cognitive Model of Driver Response Time for Scheduled Freeway Exiting Takeovers in Conditionally Automated Vehicles.
条件自动化车辆高速公路出口接管计划中驾驶员响应时间的计算认知模型。
Hum Factors. 2024 May;66(5):1583-1599. doi: 10.1177/00187208221143028. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
4
Multitasking While Driving: Central Bottleneck or Problem State Interference?驾驶时的多任务处理:中央瓶颈还是问题状态干扰?
Hum Factors. 2024 May;66(5):1564-1582. doi: 10.1177/00187208221143857. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
5
What breaks the flow of reading? A study on characteristics of attentional disruption during digital reading.是什么打断了阅读流程?一项关于数字阅读过程中注意力干扰特征的研究。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 12;13:987964. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.987964. eCollection 2022.
6
The Dual-Task Cost Is Due to Neural Interferences Disrupting the Optimal Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of the Competing Tasks.双重任务成本是由于神经干扰破坏了竞争任务的最佳时空动态。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2021 Aug 19;15:640178. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.640178. eCollection 2021.
7
Dual-Task Processing With Identical Stimulus and Response Sets: Assessing the Importance of Task Representation in Dual-Task Interference.具有相同刺激和反应集的双任务处理:评估任务表征在双任务干扰中的重要性。
Front Psychol. 2018 Jun 25;9:1031. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01031. eCollection 2018.
8
Automated Detection of Activity Transitions for Prompting.用于提示的活动转换自动检测。
IEEE Trans Hum Mach Syst. 2015 Oct;45(5):575-585. doi: 10.1109/THMS.2014.2362529. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
9
Prompting technologies: A comparison of time-based and context-aware transition-based prompting.提示技术:基于时间和上下文感知的基于转换的提示的比较。
Technol Health Care. 2015;23(6):745-56. doi: 10.3233/THC-151033.
10
Using data-driven model-brain mappings to constrain formal models of cognition.使用数据驱动的模型-大脑映射来约束认知的形式模型。
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 6;10(3):e0119673. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119673. eCollection 2015.