Krakamp B, Leidig P, Thelen E
Krankenhaus Merheim, Medizinische Klinik I, Kliniken der Stadt Köln.
Z Gastroenterol. 1996 Oct;34(10):686-91.
Three different colonoscopy preparation methods were tested in 150 out-patients who received colonoscopies, 50 in each group, a randomized prospective simple blind study. The original Golytely-recepture with three litres of liquid was tested against Clean Prep which has to be dissolved in four litres of liquid. Both receptures had the same isotonic salt solutions. The third group was a method with a laxans (X-Prep) including eating restriction lasting three days. The judgment criteria were the cleanliness of the bowel, the formation of foam and the subjective sensitivity of the patient during the preparation phase. The preparation with the three bags containing three litres of Golytely solution according to the original recepture proved to be the least troublesome for the patients and was the most efficient method when it came to cleanliness and the formation of foam. The costs of this preparation methods were lower than those of the other methods.
对150名接受结肠镜检查的门诊患者测试了三种不同的结肠镜检查准备方法，每组50人，这是一项随机前瞻性单盲研究。将含三升液体的原装聚乙二醇电解质散与需溶解于四升液体中的清肠剂进行对比测试。两种制剂都含有相同的等渗盐溶液。第三组采用一种含泻药（X-Prep）的方法，包括持续三天的饮食限制。评判标准为肠道清洁度、泡沫形成情况以及患者在准备阶段的主观感受。按照原装制剂使用三袋含三升聚乙二醇电解质散的准备方法对患者来说麻烦最少，在肠道清洁度和泡沫形成方面是最有效的方法。这种准备方法的成本低于其他方法。
