Lancet. 1997 Jan 25;349(9047):225-30.
The relative efficacy of plasma exchange (PE) and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) for the treatment of Guillain-Barré syndrome has not been established. We compared PE with IVIg, and with a combined regimen of PE followed by IVIg, in an international, multicentre, randomised trial of 383 adult patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome.
The patients were randomly assigned PE (five 50 mL/kg exchanges over 8-13 days), IVIg (Sandoglobulin, 0.4 g/kg daily for 5 days), or the PE course immediately followed by the IVIg course. The inclusion criteria were severe disease (aid needed for walking) and onset of neuropathic symptoms within the previous 14 days. Patients were followed up for 48 weeks.
Four patients were excluded because they did not meet the randomisation criteria. All the remaining 379 patients were assessed for the major outcome criterion-change on a seven-point disability grade scale-by an observer unaware of treatment assignment, 4 weeks after randomisation. At that time, the mean improvement was 0.9 (SD 1.3) in the 121 PE-group patients, 0.8 (1.3) in the 130 IVIg-group patients, and 1.1 (1.4) in the 128 patients who received both treatments (intention-to-treat analysis). None of the differences between the groups for this major outcome criterion was significant. The difference between PE alone and IVIg alone was so small that a 0.5 grade difference was excluded at the 95% level of confidence. There was no significant difference between any of the treatment groups in the secondary outcome measures: time to recovery of unaided walking, time to discontinuation of ventilation, and trend describing the recovery from disability up to 48 weeks. There was a non-significant trend towards a more favourable outcome on some outcome measures with combined treatment.
In treatment of severe Guillain-Barré syndrome during the first 2 weeks after onset of neuropathic symptoms, PE and IVIg had equivalent efficacy. The combination of PE with IVIg did not confer a significant advantage.
血浆置换(PE)和静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIg)治疗吉兰-巴雷综合征的相对疗效尚未确定。在一项针对383例成年吉兰-巴雷综合征患者的国际多中心随机试验中,我们将PE与IVIg以及先进行PE后进行IVIg的联合方案进行了比较。
患者被随机分配接受PE(在8 - 13天内进行5次50 mL/kg的置换)、IVIg(Sandoglobulin,每日0.4 g/kg,共5天)或先进行PE疗程后紧接着进行IVIg疗程。纳入标准为严重疾病(行走需要帮助)且在过去14天内出现神经病变症状。对患者进行了48周的随访。
4例患者因不符合随机化标准而被排除。在随机分组4周后,由对治疗分配不知情的观察者根据七点残疾等级量表对其余379例患者的主要结局指标变化进行评估。此时,121例PE组患者的平均改善为0.9(标准差1.3),130例IVIg组患者为0.8(1.3),128例接受两种治疗的患者为1.1(1.4)(意向性分析)。该主要结局指标在各治疗组之间的差异均无统计学意义。单独使用PE和单独使用IVIg之间的差异非常小,在95%置信水平上排除了0.5级的差异。在次要结局指标方面,各治疗组之间无显著差异:独立行走恢复时间、停止通气时间以及描述至48周时从残疾状态恢复情况的趋势。联合治疗在某些结局指标上有更有利结局的趋势,但无统计学意义。
在神经病变症状出现后的前2周内治疗严重吉兰-巴雷综合征时,PE和IVIg疗效相当。PE与IVIg联合使用并未带来显著优势。