• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于严格评估放射成像技术的快速方法。

Rapid method for rigorous assessment of radiologic imaging technologies.

作者信息

Sunshine J H, McNeil B J

机构信息

American College of Radiology, Reston, VA 22091, USA.

出版信息

Radiology. 1997 Feb;202(2):549-57. doi: 10.1148/radiology.202.2.9015089.

DOI:10.1148/radiology.202.2.9015089
PMID:9015089
Abstract

Rapid and rigorous technology evaluation is important for improving quality and cost in health care, particularly for swiftly changing, highly technologic fields like radiology. Currently, however, evaluations are generally seriously deficient in quality, and rigorous evaluations typically require 4 years or more. Therefore, the authors developed an appropriate methodology. Its principal characteristics include study of outcomes, clinical relevance, multi-institutional design, intensive communication, experienced data management and statistical centers, sophisticated analysis, careful attention to the protocol and reference standard, on-site managers, and extensive pretesting and refinement. The authors successfully tested the methodology in a seven-institution study. Completed in 1 1/4 years, the study achieved active participation of treating physicians, which much enhanced the clinical relevance of the end points studied. The data supported extensive analyses, which included the effect of imaging on treatment plans, an important outcome measure. The authors report the (limited) difficulties encountered and identify changes to ameliorate them. Thus revised, the methodology can serve as a model for future technology assessments.

摘要

快速而严谨的技术评估对于提高医疗保健的质量和成本至关重要,尤其是对于像放射学这样迅速变化、技术含量高的领域。然而,目前评估的质量普遍严重不足,而严谨的评估通常需要4年或更长时间。因此,作者开发了一种合适的方法。其主要特点包括对结果的研究、临床相关性、多机构设计、密集沟通、经验丰富的数据管理和统计中心、复杂的分析、对方案和参考标准的仔细关注、现场管理人员以及广泛的预测试和完善。作者在一项七机构研究中成功测试了该方法。该研究在1又1/4年内完成,实现了治疗医师的积极参与,这大大增强了所研究终点的临床相关性。数据支持了广泛的分析,其中包括成像对治疗计划的影响,这是一项重要的结果指标。作者报告了遇到的(有限的)困难,并确定了改进这些困难的方法。经过修订,该方法可作为未来技术评估的模型。

相似文献

1
Rapid method for rigorous assessment of radiologic imaging technologies.用于严格评估放射成像技术的快速方法。
Radiology. 1997 Feb;202(2):549-57. doi: 10.1148/radiology.202.2.9015089.
2
Strategy development for anticipating and handling a disruptive technology.预测和应对颠覆性技术的战略制定。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2006 Oct;3(10):778-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2006.03.014.
3
What is a rapid review? A methodological exploration of rapid reviews in Health Technology Assessments.什么是快速综述?卫生技术评估中快速综述方法学探索。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2012 Dec;10(4):397-410. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2012.00290.x.
4
Technology assessment for radiologists.放射科医生的技术评估
Radiology. 2004 Feb;230(2):309-14. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2302031277.
5
Technology assessment in medicine: methods, status and trends.医学技术评估:方法、现状与趋势
Med Prog Technol. 1991;17(2):69-75.
6
Imaging technology and practice assessments: diagnostic performance, clinical relevance, and generalizability in a changing environment.成像技术与实践评估:在不断变化的环境中的诊断性能、临床相关性及可推广性
Radiology. 2004 Nov;233(2):309-12. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2332040563.
7
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.
8
Colliding forces in radiology: technologic imperative, resource limitations, and accountability demands.放射学中的冲突力量:技术需求、资源限制与问责要求。
Radiographics. 1994 May;14(3):647-53; discussion 654-5. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.14.3.8066277.
9
Study design for concurrent development, assessment, and implementation of new diagnostic imaging technology.用于新诊断成像技术同步开发、评估和实施的研究设计。
Radiology. 2002 Mar;222(3):604-14. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2223010335.
10
Conditionally funded field evaluations and practical trial design within a health technology assessment framework.卫生技术评估框架内的有条件资助的现场评估和实际试验设计。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2009 May;6(5):324-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2009.01.023.

引用本文的文献

1
Can imaging help improve the survival of cancer patients?影像学检查能否提高癌症患者的生存率?
Cancer Imaging. 2011 Oct 3;11 Spec No A(1A):S86-92. doi: 10.1102/1470-7330.2011.9022.
2
Cancer imaging: is it cost-effective?癌症影像学:是否具有成本效益?
Cancer Imaging. 2004 Apr 6;4(2):97-103. doi: 10.1102/1470-7330.2004.0017.
3
Study design and analysis in neuroradiology: a practical approach.神经放射学中的研究设计与分析:实用方法
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1999 Oct;20(9):1584-96.