• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与经颈静脉肝内门体分流术功能障碍相关的多普勒超声检查结果。

Doppler sonography findings associated with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt malfunction.

作者信息

Kanterman R Y, Darcy M D, Middleton W D, Sterling K M, Teefey S A, Pilgram T K

机构信息

Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63112, USA.

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997 Feb;168(2):467-72. doi: 10.2214/ajr.168.2.9016228.

DOI:10.2214/ajr.168.2.9016228
PMID:9016228
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to determine the overall accuracy of Doppler sonography and the accuracy of specific Doppler parameters associated with a compromised transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For 43 patients who had undergone TIPS, 64 correlated sonogram-venogram paired examinations were analyzed. Sonographic parameters assessed included absolute velocities plus absolute and percentage changes in velocities measured in the main portal vein (MPV) and in several intrashunt locations (including peak and minimum velocity). Direction of flow and change in direction of flow in the left and right portal veins were also examined. TIPS malfunction was defined as any shunt with greater than or equal to 50% stenosis or any stenosis with a portosystemic gradient greater than 15 mm Hg.

RESULTS

The prospective interpretation of the sonograms using all available parameters resulted in a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 72% for detecting TIPS malfunction. Peak shunt velocity (absolute velocity and velocity change), distal shunt velocity, MPV velocity (absolute velocity and percentage change in velocity), change in minimum shunt velocity, and direction of flow in branch portal veins were found to have statistically significant differences between normal and abnormal shunts. Sensitivities for these individual parameters ranged from 64% to 84%, and specificities ranged from 70% to 100%. When either the MPV velocity or the distal shunt velocity was abnormal, the sensitivity was 94%. When both parameters were abnormal, the specificity for detecting TIPS malfunction was 100%.

CONCLUSION

Doppler sonography is a sensitive and relatively specific means of revealing TIPS malfunction. Accuracy depends on analysis of multiple sonographic parameters.

摘要

目的

我们的目的是确定多普勒超声检查的总体准确性以及与经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)功能受损相关的特定多普勒参数的准确性。

材料与方法

对43例行TIPS的患者进行了64次相关的超声-静脉造影配对检查分析。评估的超声参数包括在主门静脉(MPV)和几个分流部位(包括峰值和最小速度)测量的绝对速度以及速度的绝对变化和百分比变化。还检查了左、右门静脉的血流方向和血流方向变化。TIPS功能障碍定义为任何狭窄程度大于或等于50%的分流或任何门体压差大于15 mmHg的狭窄。

结果

使用所有可用参数对超声图进行前瞻性解读,检测TIPS功能障碍的敏感性为92%,特异性为72%。发现正常分流和异常分流之间,分流峰值速度(绝对速度和速度变化)、分流远端速度、MPV速度(绝对速度和速度百分比变化)、分流最小速度变化以及分支门静脉血流方向存在统计学显著差异。这些单个参数的敏感性范围为64%至84%,特异性范围为70%至100%。当MPV速度或分流远端速度异常时,敏感性为94%。当两个参数均异常时,检测TIPS功能障碍的特异性为100%。

结论

多普勒超声检查是揭示TIPS功能障碍的一种敏感且相对特异的方法。准确性取决于对多个超声参数的分析。

相似文献

1
Doppler sonography findings associated with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt malfunction.与经颈静脉肝内门体分流术功能障碍相关的多普勒超声检查结果。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997 Feb;168(2):467-72. doi: 10.2214/ajr.168.2.9016228.
2
Detection of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt dysfunction: value of duplex Doppler sonography.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术功能障碍的检测:双功多普勒超声检查的价值
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 May;164(5):1119-24. doi: 10.2214/ajr.164.5.7717217.
3
Value of Doppler sonography in revealing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt malfunction: a 5-year experience in 216 patients.多普勒超声检查在揭示经颈静脉肝内门体分流术功能障碍中的价值:216例患者的5年经验
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Jul;175(1):141-8. doi: 10.2214/ajr.175.1.1750141.
4
Short- and long-term hemodynamic effects of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts: a Doppler/manometric correlative study.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术的短期和长期血流动力学效应:一项多普勒/测压相关性研究。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Apr;164(4):997-1002. doi: 10.2214/ajr.164.4.7726065.
5
Duplex sonography after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS): normal hemodynamic findings and efficacy in predicting shunt patency and stenosis.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)后的双功超声检查:正常血流动力学表现及预测分流道通畅和狭窄的效能
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Jul;165(1):1-7. doi: 10.2214/ajr.165.1.7785564.
6
Covered transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts: accuracy of ultrasound in detecting shunt malfunction.覆膜经颈静脉肝内门体分流术:超声检测分流故障的准确性。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Apr;200(4):904-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.8761.
7
Long-term follow-up after TIPS: use of Doppler velocity criteria for detecting elevation of the portosystemic gradient.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)后的长期随访:使用多普勒速度标准检测门体静脉压力梯度升高
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1998 Mar-Apr;9(2):275-81. doi: 10.1016/s1051-0443(98)70269-6.
8
[Can the function of the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt be evaluated noninvasively by Doppler sonography?].经颈静脉肝内门体分流术的功能能否通过多普勒超声进行无创评估?
Z Gastroenterol. 1999 Sep;37(9):771-8.
9
Value of echo-enhanced Doppler sonography in evaluation of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts.超声造影增强多普勒超声在经颈静脉肝内门体分流术评估中的价值。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998 Apr;170(4):1041-6. doi: 10.2214/ajr.170.4.9530056.
10
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS): effects of respiratory state and patient position on the measurement of Doppler velocities.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS):呼吸状态和患者体位对多普勒流速测量的影响
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Jul;175(1):149-52. doi: 10.2214/ajr.175.1.1750149.

引用本文的文献

1
Doppler velocities in patent transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts: an analysis of 10 mm vs. 8 mm shunts.
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 May;50(5):2121-2125. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04682-1. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
2
Use of doppler ultrasound to predict need for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt revision.使用多普勒超声预测经颈静脉肝内门体分流术翻修的必要性。
World J Hepatol. 2022 Jun 27;14(6):1200-1209. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i6.1200.
3
Retrospective evaluation of early thrombosis in transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic polytetrafluoroethylene-coated shunts under 2-day postinterventional heparinization.经皮经肝门静脉-腔静脉聚四氟乙烯涂层分流术术后 2 天内肝素化后早期血栓的回顾性评估。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 22;12(1):10506. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14388-3.
4
A new choice of stent for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation: Viabahn ePTFE covered stent/bare metal stent combination.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术支架的新选择:Viabahn ePTFE覆膜支架/裸金属支架组合
J Interv Med. 2020 Oct 13;4(1):32-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jimed.2020.10.003. eCollection 2021 Feb.
5
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in cirrhosis: An exhaustive critical update.肝硬化患者经颈静脉肝内门体分流术:详尽的批判性更新。
World J Gastroenterol. 2020 Oct 7;26(37):5561-5596. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i37.5561.
6
Parallel transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt with Viatorr stents for primary TIPS insufficiency: Case series and review of literature.使用Viatorr支架行平行经颈静脉肝内门体分流术治疗原发性经颈静脉肝内门体分流术功能不全:病例系列及文献综述
World J Hepatol. 2019 Feb 27;11(2):217-225. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v11.i2.217.
7
The Feasibility of Using Volumetric Phase-Contrast MR Imaging (4D Flow) to Assess for Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Dysfunction.使用容积相位对比磁共振成像(4D 血流)评估经颈静脉肝内门体分流功能障碍的可行性。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018 Dec;29(12):1717-1724. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2018.07.022. Epub 2018 Nov 3.
8
Persistence of gastric or esophageal varices on final angiography increases transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt revision rate after polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent shunt creation.在聚四氟乙烯覆膜支架分流术创建后,最终血管造影显示胃或食管静脉曲张持续存在会增加经颈静脉肝内门体分流术的翻修率。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2018 Mar;8(2):174-181. doi: 10.21037/qims.2018.03.05.
9
Evaluation of Doppler-ultrasonography in the diagnosis of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt dysfunction: A prospective study.多普勒超声检查在经颈静脉肝内门体分流术功能障碍诊断中的评估:一项前瞻性研究。
World J Hepatol. 2017 Sep 28;9(27):1125-1132. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v9.i27.1125.
10
An Algorithm for Management After Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Placement According to Clinical Manifestations.一种根据临床表现进行经颈静脉肝内门体分流术放置后管理的算法。
Dig Dis Sci. 2017 Feb;62(2):305-318. doi: 10.1007/s10620-016-4399-4. Epub 2017 Jan 5.