Murphy T P, Beecham R P, Kim H M, Webb M S, Scola F
Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence 02903, USA.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1998 Mar-Apr;9(2):275-81. doi: 10.1016/s1051-0443(98)70269-6.
To evaluate the performance of Doppler ultrasound as a screening test for detecting elevated portosystemic gradients in failing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS).
Twenty-seven of 61 patients who underwent TIPS creation between November 1991 and March 1996 were studied. At routine intervals, angle-corrected velocity measurements of portal venous and intrashunt blood flow (at the portal venous, middle, and hepatic venous levels of the shunt) were obtained. These were compared with portal hemodynamics for diagnostic accuracy in predicting clinically significant elevation of the portosystemic gradient. Venographic and manometric correlations were obtained on all patients available for follow-up and were not limited to those with symptoms or "abnormal" Doppler studies. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were done. Linear regression was done to study correlation of shunt velocities with portal pressure, and logistic regression was done to predict shunt stenosis with use of shunt velocities.
The most accurate location for shunt velocity measurement was the main portal vein, but this had an area under the ROC curve of only 0.70. Accuracy of any velocity threshold (including maximum shunt velocity) was no greater than 70%. Maximum shunt velocity of less than 60 cm/sec was 93% specific for detecting shunt restenosis, but only 25% sensitive, for an overall accuracy of 64%. High sensitivity (90%) could only be achieved with poor specificity (< 33%). Linear regression revealed poor correlation between shunt or portal vein velocity measurements and portal pressure (/r/ < 0.23 for all).
Intrashunt and portal venous Doppler velocities alone do not accurately predict elevation of the portosystemic gradient on long-term follow-up after TIPS.
评估多普勒超声作为检测功能不良的经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)中门体梯度升高的筛查试验的性能。
对1991年11月至1996年3月间接受TIPS创建的61例患者中的27例进行研究。定期获取门静脉和分流道内血流的角度校正速度测量值(在分流道的门静脉、中间和肝静脉水平)。将这些测量值与门静脉血流动力学进行比较,以预测门体梯度临床显著升高的诊断准确性。对所有可进行随访的患者进行静脉造影和压力测量相关性分析,且不限于有症状或“异常”多普勒检查的患者。绘制受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线。进行线性回归以研究分流速度与门静脉压力的相关性,并进行逻辑回归以利用分流速度预测分流道狭窄。
测量分流速度最准确的位置是门静脉主干,但该位置的ROC曲线下面积仅为0.70。任何速度阈值(包括最大分流速度)的准确性均不超过70%。最大分流速度小于60 cm/秒对检测分流道再狭窄的特异性为93%,但敏感性仅为25%,总体准确性为64%。高敏感性(90%)只能在低特异性(< 33%)的情况下实现。线性回归显示分流道或门静脉速度测量值与门静脉压力之间的相关性较差(所有相关性/r/ < 0.23)。
仅靠分流道和门静脉多普勒速度不能准确预测TIPS术后长期随访中的门体梯度升高。