Ferraris R P, Diamond J
Physiology Department, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, USA.
Physiol Rev. 1997 Jan;77(1):257-302. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1997.77.1.257.
The recent surge in knowledge of cellular and molecular mechanisms of intestinal sugar transport has fueled an enormous interest in adaptive mechanisms regulating sugar transport. We first review several functional considerations that help us interpret the different patterns of adaptation for different nutrients. We then distinguish nonspecific adaptive mechanisms leading to parallel changes in transport of different nutrients from specific adaptive mechanisms only affecting the transport of a single nutrient. Nonspecific adaptive mechanisms include changes in mucosal surface area and in the ratio of transporting to nontransporting cells; specific mechanisms include changes in site density of transporters and in affinity constants. We also enumerate the patterns of regulation and describe how sugar transport is affected by changes in diet, energy budgets, and environmental salinity as well as by intestinal resection, starvation, stress, and age. We relate the various signals linking these stimuli to adaptive mechanisms and make predictions about the nature of these signals. Finally, we describe the significance of the interactions among sugar, fluid, and electrolyte transport mechanisms and of the paracellular pathway to transepithelial transport of sugars. We close by drawing attention to promising directions for future research.
近年来,肠道糖转运细胞和分子机制的知识激增,引发了人们对调节糖转运的适应性机制的极大兴趣。我们首先回顾几个功能方面的考量因素,这些因素有助于我们解读不同营养素的不同适应模式。然后,我们区分导致不同营养素转运平行变化的非特异性适应性机制和仅影响单一营养素转运的特异性适应性机制。非特异性适应性机制包括黏膜表面积的变化以及转运细胞与非转运细胞比例的变化;特异性机制包括转运体位点密度的变化和亲和常数的变化。我们还列举了调节模式,并描述了饮食、能量预算、环境盐度的变化以及肠道切除、饥饿、应激和年龄如何影响糖转运。我们阐述了将这些刺激与适应性机制联系起来的各种信号,并对这些信号的性质进行预测。最后,我们描述了糖、液体和电解质转运机制之间相互作用的意义以及旁细胞途径对糖跨上皮转运的意义。最后,我们提请注意未来研究的有前景的方向。