• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

管理式医疗时代的信任与值得信赖的医疗服务。

Trust and trustworthy care in the managed care era.

作者信息

Gray B H

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 1997 Jan-Feb;16(1):34-49. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.16.1.34.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.16.1.34
PMID:9018941
Abstract

Trust is essential to the doctor/patient relationship, but trust in physicians' fiduciary ethic has become less plausible as a protector of patients' interests. The rise of managed care often is seen as undermining the fiduciary ethic and lessening the trustworthiness of care. But can managed care enhance that trustworthiness? Four possible sources of trustworthiness in managed care are discussed: ethical standards in the managed care industry, nonprofit organizations, physician control, and performance monitoring by purchasers. Limitations on all of these fronts suggest the continuing importance of a strong fiduciary ethic on the part of physicians who make patient care decisions.

摘要

信任对于医患关系至关重要,但作为患者利益的保护者,对医生信托伦理的信任已变得不那么可信。管理式医疗的兴起常常被视为破坏了信托伦理并降低了医疗的可信度。但是管理式医疗能否提高这种可信度呢?本文讨论了管理式医疗中可信度的四个可能来源:管理式医疗行业的道德标准、非营利组织、医生控制以及购买者的绩效监测。所有这些方面的局限性表明,做出患者护理决策的医生秉持强烈的信托伦理仍然至关重要。

相似文献

1
Trust and trustworthy care in the managed care era.管理式医疗时代的信任与值得信赖的医疗服务。
Health Aff (Millwood). 1997 Jan-Feb;16(1):34-49. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.16.1.34.
2
Interests, obligations, and justice: some notes toward an ethic of managed care.利益、义务与公正:关于管理式医疗伦理的几点笔记
J Clin Ethics. 1995 Winter;6(4):312-7.
3
The impact of managed care on patients' trust in medical care and their physicians.管理式医疗对患者对医疗护理及其医生的信任的影响。
JAMA. 1996 Jun 5;275(21):1693-7.
4
Ethical issues in managed care: can the traditional physician-patient relationship be preserved in the era of managed care or should it be replaced by a group ethic?管理式医疗中的伦理问题:在管理式医疗时代,传统的医患关系能否得以维系,还是应由一种群体伦理取而代之?
Univ Mich J Law Reform. 1999 Summer;32(4):619-59.
5
Physicians as double agents: maintaining trust in an era of multiple accountabilities.身兼双重角色的医生:在多重责任时代维系信任。
JAMA. 1998;280(12):1102-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.12.1102.
6
Are ethics and managed care strange bedfellows or a marriage made in heaven?
Lancet. 1997 Feb 1;349(9048):350-1. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)04025-1.
7
Trust in managed care organizations.对管理式医疗组织的信任。
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2000 Sep;10(3):189-212. doi: 10.1353/ken.2000.0018.
8
Money and trust: relationships between patients, physicians, and health plans.金钱与信任:患者、医生和健康计划之间的关系。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1998 Aug;23(4):687-95. doi: 10.1215/03616878-23-4-687.
9
Comments on the AMA report "Ethical issues in managed care".关于美国医学协会报告《管理式医疗中的伦理问题》的评论
J Clin Ethics. 1995 Winter;6(4):306-11.
10
Physicians as advocates.作为倡导者的医生。
Houst Law Rev. 1999 Spring;35(5):1529-1630.

引用本文的文献

1
Organizational Factors that Impact Trust in Healing Relationships: A Qualitative Study.影响治疗关系中信任的组织因素:一项定性研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Aug 7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09783-1.
2
The Effect of Artificial Intelligence on Patient-Physician Trust: Cross-Sectional Vignette Study.人工智能对医患信任的影响:横断面情境研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 May 28;26:e50853. doi: 10.2196/50853.
3
Trust in public health policy in the time of the COVID-19 epidemic in Israel.新冠疫情期间,公众对以色列公共卫生政策的信任。
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2024 Apr 25;13(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13584-024-00607-x.
4
A fuzzy trust measurement method considering patients' trust opinions in Internet plus Healthcare.一种考虑患者在“互联网 + 医疗健康”中信任意见的模糊信任度量方法。
Procedia Comput Sci. 2022;207:3488-3498. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.09.407. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
5
Assessment of Social Trust in Relatives of Discharged Patients With Personal Consent and Other Relatives of Patients.对获得个人同意的出院患者亲属及其他患者亲属的社会信任度评估。
J Patient Exp. 2022 Jul 6;9:23743735221113053. doi: 10.1177/23743735221113053. eCollection 2022.
6
(Dis)trust in doctors and public and private healthcare institutions in the Western Balkans.(对医生和西巴尔干地区公立和私立医疗机构的)不信任。
Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):2015-2024. doi: 10.1111/hex.13562. Epub 2022 Jul 3.
7
Investigating the Relationships Between Public Health Literacy and Public Trust in Physicians in China's Control of COVID-19: A Cross-Sectional Study.调查中国控制 COVID-19 过程中公众健康素养与公众对医生信任之间的关系:一项横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2021 Oct 28;9:758529. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.758529. eCollection 2021.
8
How Public Trust in Health Care Can Shape Patient Overconsumption in Health Systems? The Missing Links.公众对医疗保健的信任如何影响医疗体系中的患者过度消费?缺失的环节。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 7;18(8):3860. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18083860.
9
The Efficiency of self-employed general practitioners and factors affecting it: a study in Iran.个体开业全科医生的效率及其影响因素:伊朗的一项研究。
BMC Res Notes. 2020 Jun 1;13(1):266. doi: 10.1186/s13104-020-05104-3.
10
Patient factors that affect trust in physicians: a cross-sectional study.影响患者对医生信任的因素:一项横断面研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Nov 29;19(1):187. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0875-6.