Mechanic D, Schlesinger M
Institute for Health, Health Care Policy, and Aging Research, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA.
JAMA. 1996 Jun 5;275(21):1693-7.
Social trust in health care organizations and interpersonal trust in physicians may be mutually supportive, but they also diverge in important ways. The success of medical care depends most importantly on patients' trust that their physicians are competent, take appropriate responsibility and control, and give their patients' welfare the highest priority. Utilization review and structural arrangements in managed care potentially challenge trust in physicians by restricting choice, contradicting medical decisions and control, and restricting open communication with patients. Gatekeeping and incentives to limit care also raise serious trust issues. We argue that managed care plans rather than physicians should be required to disclose financial arrangements, that limits be placed on incentives that put physicians at financial risk, and that professional norms and public policies should encourage clear separation of interests of physicians from health plan organization and finance.
对医疗保健机构的社会信任和对医生的人际信任可能相互支持,但在重要方面也存在差异。医疗护理的成功最重要地取决于患者相信他们的医生有能力、承担适当责任并进行控制,且将患者的福祉置于最高优先级。管理式医疗中的利用审查和结构安排可能通过限制选择、与医疗决策和控制相矛盾以及限制与患者的开放沟通来挑战对医生的信任。守门制度和限制医疗护理的激励措施也引发了严重的信任问题。我们认为,应该要求管理式医疗计划而非医生披露财务安排,限制使医生面临财务风险的激励措施,并且专业规范和公共政策应鼓励将医生的利益与健康计划组织和财务明确分开。