Kinjerski T L, Buckheit R W
Virology Research Group, Southern Research Institute, Frederick Research Center, Maryland 21701, USA.
Antiviral Res. 1997 Jan;33(2):109-15. doi: 10.1016/s0166-3542(96)01008-x.
Virus populations were selected in cell culture using two widely used protocols in order to evaluate the role of selection methodology on the genotype and phenotype of nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistant viruses. Selection was performed by serial passage of virus in the presence of gradually increasing concentrations of antiviral compound or passage in the presence of a constant high concentration of compound. Using the CEM-SS cell line, the IIIB strain of HIV-1, and identical nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, resistant viruses were obtained and their phenotypic and genotypic properties were defined. Resistant virus populations containing the Y181C amino acid change in the reverse transcriptase were predominantly selected with each of the tested compounds. Several of the compounds selected secondary amino acid changes using both methods. A comparison of the resistant viruses selected in our laboratory using each of the two protocols with viruses reported by a second laboratory employing one of the two methods suggests that genotypic differences in the selected virus isolates may most likely result from the variation in the genetic composition of the respective wild type virus pools, rather than the specific selection methodology employed. These results imply that HIV may select a wide variety of amino acid changes to avoid the inhibitory effects of the nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and the selection of compounds for clinical use in combination with agents possessing non-overlapping resistance phenotypes will require evaluation of the agents against virus isolates possessing each of the mutations known to confer drug resistance.
为了评估选择方法对非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂耐药病毒基因型和表型的作用,在细胞培养中使用两种广泛应用的方案对病毒群体进行了选择。选择是通过在逐渐增加浓度的抗病毒化合物存在下连续传代病毒,或在恒定高浓度化合物存在下传代来进行的。使用CEM-SS细胞系、HIV-1的IIIB株和相同的非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂,获得了耐药病毒,并确定了它们的表型和基因型特性。在每种测试化合物中,主要选择在逆转录酶中含有Y181C氨基酸变化的耐药病毒群体。几种化合物通过两种方法都选择了次要氨基酸变化。将我们实验室使用两种方案中的每一种选择的耐药病毒与另一个实验室使用两种方法之一报告的病毒进行比较表明,所选病毒分离株的基因型差异很可能是由于各自野生型病毒库的遗传组成差异,而不是所采用的特定选择方法。这些结果表明,HIV可能选择多种氨基酸变化来避免非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂的抑制作用,并且选择与具有不重叠耐药表型的药物联合用于临床的化合物将需要评估这些药物对具有已知赋予耐药性的每种突变的病毒分离株的作用。