Balasch J, Creus M, Fábregues F, Casamitjana R, Ordi J, Vanrell J A
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine-University of Barcelona, Hospital Clínic i Provincial, Spain.
Hum Reprod. 1996 Dec;11(12):2591-4. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019175.
The present prospective clinical study was undertaken to determine the usefulness of midluteal phase serum immunoreactive alpha-inhibin concentrations as markers of luteal phase deficiency and whether they are better indicators of biopsy confirmed luteal phase defect than serum progesterone. Consecutive patients (n = 138) with regular menstrual cycles attending our Infertility Clinic (experimental group) and 15 fertile women who were requesting contraception and had regular menstrual patterns (control group) were included. In all women (patients and controls), basal body temperature, midluteal serum concentrations of oestradiol, prolactin, progesterone and immunoreactive alpha-inhibin, and premenstrual endometrial biopsy were used in the same cycle to assess luteal function. Out-of-phase secretory endometria were detected in 15 of the 138 patients. Thus, hormonal concentrations were compared between the following three groups of women: group 1 (n = 15), infertile patients with defective secretory endometria; group 2 (n = 123), infertile patients with normal secretory endometria; and controls (n = 15), fertile women with normal secretory endometria. Midluteal serum concentrations of progesterone, immunoreactive alpha-inhibin, oestradiol, and prolactin of the two groups studied were similar to those of the control group of fertile women. Our results indicate that midluteal serum inhibin determination does not accurately reflect histological maturation of the endometrium and it is not a better indicator of endometrial luteal phase deficiency than midluteal serum progesterone concentration.
本前瞻性临床研究旨在确定黄体中期血清免疫反应性α-抑制素浓度作为黄体期缺陷标志物的实用性,以及与血清孕酮相比,它们是否是活检确诊的黄体期缺陷的更好指标。纳入了在我们不孕症诊所就诊的月经周期规律的连续患者(n = 138)(实验组)和15名要求避孕且月经周期规律的有生育能力的女性(对照组)。在所有女性(患者和对照组)中,在同一周期使用基础体温、黄体中期血清雌二醇、催乳素、孕酮和免疫反应性α-抑制素浓度以及经前子宫内膜活检来评估黄体功能。138例患者中有15例检测到分泌期子宫内膜不同步。因此,对以下三组女性的激素浓度进行了比较:第1组(n = 15),分泌期子宫内膜有缺陷的不孕患者;第2组(n = 123),分泌期子宫内膜正常的不孕患者;以及对照组(n = 15),分泌期子宫内膜正常的有生育能力的女性。所研究的两组黄体中期血清孕酮、免疫反应性α-抑制素、雌二醇和催乳素浓度与有生育能力的女性对照组相似。我们的结果表明,黄体中期血清抑制素测定不能准确反映子宫内膜的组织学成熟情况,并且它不是比黄体中期血清孕酮浓度更好的子宫内膜黄体期缺陷指标。