Balasch J, Fábregues F, Peñarrubia J, Creus M, Vidal R, Casamitjana R, Manau D, Vanrell J A
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Hospital Clínic i Provincial-Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Spain.
J Assist Reprod Genet. 1998 Oct;15(9):552-9. doi: 10.1023/a:1022586221077.
Our purpose was to compare ovarian performance and hormonal levels, after ovulation induction, in both normal ovulatory women undergoing intrauterine insemination (group 1) and World Health Organization (WHO) group II anovulatory infertile patients (group 2), using two different gonadotropin drugs.
Patients (n = 20 per group) were treated during consecutive cycles, using the same stimulation protocol, with highly purified urinary FSH (HP-FSH) in the first treatment study cycle and recombinant FSH (rFSH) in the second one. Patients in group 1 were treated according to a late low-dose technique, and WHO group II anovulatory patients (group 2) received chronic low-dose FSH therapy.
Compared with HP-FSH, treatment with rFSH in group 2 required significantly less ampules of drug to induce follicular development but resulted in significantly higher plasma levels of estradiol and inhibin A on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin injection. No differences were found when both treatment modalities were compared in group 1.
rFSH is more efficacious than urinary HP-FSH for ovulation induction in WHO group II anovulatory infertile patients as assessed by follicular development, hormonal levels, and the amount of FSH required.
我们的目的是比较在使用两种不同促性腺激素药物进行排卵诱导后,正常排卵且接受宫内人工授精的女性(第1组)和世界卫生组织(WHO)II组无排卵性不孕患者(第2组)的卵巢功能和激素水平。
患者(每组20例)在连续周期中接受治疗,采用相同的刺激方案,在第一个治疗研究周期使用高度纯化的尿促卵泡素(HP-FSH),在第二个周期使用重组促卵泡素(rFSH)。第1组患者按照晚期低剂量技术进行治疗,WHO II组无排卵患者(第2组)接受慢性低剂量FSH治疗。
与HP-FSH相比,第2组使用rFSH治疗诱导卵泡发育所需的药物安瓿显著减少,但在注射人绒毛膜促性腺激素当天,血浆雌二醇和抑制素A水平显著升高。在第1组中比较两种治疗方式时未发现差异。
就卵泡发育、激素水平和所需FSH量评估,对于WHO II组无排卵性不孕患者,rFSH在排卵诱导方面比尿HP-FSH更有效。