• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

洛哌丁胺摄入情况监测:对216份中毒控制中心报告的分析

Surveillance of loperamide ingestions: an analysis of 216 poison center reports.

作者信息

Litovitz T, Clancy C, Korberly B, Temple A R, Mann K V

机构信息

National Capital Poison Center, Washington, DC 20016, USA.

出版信息

J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1997;35(1):11-9. doi: 10.3109/15563659709001159.

DOI:10.3109/15563659709001159
PMID:9022646
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Loperamide was approved for nonprescription use in 1988. While efficacy is well documented, there are few data on loperamide overdose and management.

METHODS

Eight poison centers participated in a prospective study enrolling 216 patients.

RESULTS

Where the amount ingested was known, it ranged from 0.03 to 0.94 mg/kg. One- to 3-year-olds were involved in 57.9% of ingestions. Ingestion was unintentional in 182 cases (84.3%), including 59 patients with therapeutic errors (27.3% of all cases). Dispensing cup errors were implicated in 23 cases; 15 patients assumed the dispensing cup was the unit of measure. No symptoms developed in 63.0%; 27.8% had related symptoms. No related symptoms were life-threatening, and no fatalities occurred. The most frequent symptoms were drowsiness (15.7%), vomiting (4.2%), and abdominal pain or burning (3.7%). The frequency of related symptoms was compared in patients receiving the most frequently utilized decontamination modalities: ipecac alone, activated charcoal alone, lavage and activated charcoal, and ipecac and activated charcoal. Compared to the 112 patients who received no decontamination, only the ipecac-treated group demonstrated a significant reduction in the frequency of related symptoms; 13.9% of patients given ipecac alone (without other gastric decontamination) had related symptoms compared to 33.0% of patients who received no decontamination. Three patients received naloxone for CNS symptoms related to loperamide; two responded and the response of the third was unknown.

CONCLUSION

Within the range of doses implicated in this study (up to 0.94 mg/kg), there were no life threatening clinical effects and no fatalities. Development of a management protocol is complicated by the absence of a predictable clinical response in each dose range. The data suggest that children over six months with single acute ingestions up to 0.4 mg/kg, and possibly higher, can be safely managed at home, without gastric decontamination.

摘要

背景

洛哌丁胺于1988年被批准非处方使用。虽然其疗效已有充分记录,但关于洛哌丁胺过量及处理的数据却很少。

方法

8个中毒控制中心参与了一项前瞻性研究,共纳入216例患者。

结果

已知摄入剂量范围为0.03至0.94毫克/千克。1至3岁儿童占摄入病例的57.9%。182例(84.3%)摄入为无意摄入,其中59例患者存在治疗失误(占所有病例的27.3%)。23例涉及配药杯失误;15例患者以为配药杯是计量单位。63.0%的患者未出现症状;27.8%的患者出现相关症状。无相关症状危及生命,也未发生死亡。最常见的症状为嗜睡(15.7%)、呕吐(4.2%)以及腹痛或烧灼感(3.7%)。对接受最常用去污方式的患者的相关症状发生频率进行了比较:单独使用吐根糖浆、单独使用活性炭、洗胃加活性炭以及吐根糖浆加活性炭。与112例未进行去污的患者相比,只有接受吐根糖浆治疗的组相关症状发生频率显著降低;单独使用吐根糖浆(未进行其他胃部去污)的患者中有13.9%出现相关症状,而未进行去污的患者中有33.0%出现相关症状。3例患者因与洛哌丁胺相关的中枢神经系统症状接受了纳洛酮治疗;2例有反应,第3例的反应未知。

结论

在本研究涉及的剂量范围内(最高0.94毫克/千克),未出现危及生命的临床效应,也未发生死亡。由于每个剂量范围内缺乏可预测的临床反应,制定处理方案变得复杂。数据表明,单次急性摄入剂量达0.4毫克/千克甚至更高的6个月以上儿童可在家中安全处理,无需进行胃部去污。

相似文献

1
Surveillance of loperamide ingestions: an analysis of 216 poison center reports.洛哌丁胺摄入情况监测:对216份中毒控制中心报告的分析
J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1997;35(1):11-9. doi: 10.3109/15563659709001159.
2
The outcome of North American pediatric unintentional mushroom ingestions with various decontamination treatments: an analysis of 14 years of TESS data.北美儿童意外摄入蘑菇后采用不同去污治疗的结果:对14年TESS数据的分析
Toxicon. 2009 Mar 15;53(4):437-43. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2009.01.004.
3
Toxic exposures and ingestions in Honolulu: I. A prospective pediatric ED cohort; II. A prospective poison center cohort.檀香山的有毒物质暴露与摄入情况:一、儿科急诊前瞻性队列研究;二、中毒控制中心前瞻性队列研究。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 1991 Jun;7(3):141-8. doi: 10.1097/00006565-199106000-00003.
4
Pediatric gastrointestinal decontamination in acute toxin ingestion.急性毒素摄入时的儿科胃肠道去污处理
J Clin Pharmacol. 1993 Jun;33(6):497-507. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1993.tb04695.x.
5
Calcium channel blocker ingestions in children.儿童钙通道阻滞剂摄入情况
Am J Emerg Med. 2000 Sep;18(5):581-6. doi: 10.1053/ajem.2000.9264.
6
Outcomes of acute exploratory pediatric lithium ingestions.急性探索性儿童锂摄入的结果。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2020 Sep;58(9):881-885. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2019.1704772. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
7
Influence of time until emesis on the efficacy of decontamination using acetaminophen as a marker in a pediatric population.直至呕吐的时间对以对乙酰氨基酚作为标志物在儿科人群中进行去污效果的影响。
Ann Emerg Med. 1993 Sep;22(9):1403-7. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)81986-9.
8
A review of the management of oral drug overdose in the Accident and Emergency Department of the Royal Brisbane Hospital.皇家布里斯班医院急诊科口服药物过量管理综述。
Arch Emerg Med. 1991 Mar;8(1):8-16. doi: 10.1136/emj.8.1.8.
9
Home use of syrup of ipecac is associated with a reduction in pediatric emergency department visits.在家中使用吐根糖浆与儿科急诊就诊人数减少有关。
Ann Emerg Med. 1995 Mar;25(3):338-43. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70291-1.
10
Gastrointestinal decontamination for enteric-coated aspirin overdose: what to do depends on who you ask.肠溶阿司匹林过量的胃肠道去污:该怎么做取决于你问谁。
J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 2000;38(5):465-70. doi: 10.1081/clt-100102004.

引用本文的文献

1
The Potential Mechanisms behind Loperamide-Induced Cardiac Arrhythmias Associated with Human Abuse and Extreme Overdose.洛哌丁胺致人类滥用和极端过量相关心律失常的潜在机制。
Biomolecules. 2023 Sep 6;13(9):1355. doi: 10.3390/biom13091355.
2
Loperamide overdose causing torsades de pointes and requiring Impella temporary mechanical support: a case report.洛哌丁胺过量导致尖端扭转型室速并需要Impella临时机械支持:一例报告
Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2019 Dec;3(4):1-6. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytz150. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
3
Loperamide Induced Torsades de Pointes: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.
洛哌丁胺诱发尖端扭转型室速:一例病例报告及文献综述
Case Rep Med. 2016;2016:4061980. doi: 10.1155/2016/4061980. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
4
Loperamide dependence and abuse.洛哌丁胺依赖与滥用。
BMJ Case Rep. 2015 May 2;2015:bcr2015209705. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2015-209705.
5
"I just wanted to tell you that loperamide WILL WORK": a web-based study of extra-medical use of loperamide.“我只是想告诉你,洛哌丁胺是有效的”:一项关于洛哌丁胺非医疗用途的网络研究。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013 Jun 1;130(1-3):241-4. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.11.003. Epub 2012 Nov 30.
6
Itraconazole, gemfibrozil and their combination markedly raise the plasma concentrations of loperamide.伊曲康唑、吉非罗齐及其组合显著提高洛哌丁胺的血浆浓度。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2006 Jun;62(6):463-72. doi: 10.1007/s00228-006-0133-z. Epub 2006 Apr 27.
7
Racecadotril versus loperamide: antidiarrheal research revisited.消旋卡多曲与洛哌丁胺:腹泻治疗研究再探讨
Dig Dis Sci. 2003 Feb;48(2):239-50. doi: 10.1023/a:1021989606317.
8
Reporting of adverse drug reactions by poison control centres in the US.美国毒物控制中心对药物不良反应的报告。
Drug Saf. 2000 Jul;23(1):87-93. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200023010-00006.