Littlewood R
University College London, UK.
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 1996 Winter;42(4):245-68. doi: 10.1177/002076409604200402.
Culture remains an ambiguous concept for psychiatry: deprecated by the assumption that it is secondary to biomedical reality, yet at the same time some notion of 'culture' has served to represent the modern against the primitive. Contemporary clinical understandings of culture derive from imperial medicine which had applied the accepted distinction between the biological form and the cultural content of psychopathology to local illnesses which could not easily be fitted into the European nosology. The later concept of culture-bound pathology, like the psychoanalysts' 'modal personality', only imperfectly escaped from evaluative assumptions of 'development', but it is difficult to argue that psychiatry provided British colonial administrations with any significant ideological justification.
一方面,由于认为文化次于生物医学现实这一假设,它被贬低;然而与此同时,某种“文化”概念又被用来代表现代对抗原始。当代对文化的临床理解源自帝国医学,帝国医学将心理病理学的生物形式与文化内容之间已被认可的区分应用于那些难以归入欧洲疾病分类学的本土疾病。后来的文化束缚性病理学概念,就像精神分析学家的“典型人格”一样,只是不完全摆脱了“发展”的评价性假设,但很难说精神病学为英国殖民政府提供了任何重要的意识形态依据。