Ginifer C, Kelly A M
Emergency Department, Western Hospital, Footscray, Australia.
Eur J Emerg Med. 1996 Jun;3(2):92-4. doi: 10.1097/00063110-199606000-00006.
The aim of this study was to compare the total dose of intravenous pethidine required to give satisfactory analgesia to patients with acute renal colic between two groups, one of which was also administered rectal indomethacin on presentation and one which was not. This was a prospective, randomized, unblinded comparison study. Each group contained 39 patients. Group 1 received rectal indomethacin 100 mg and intravenous pethidine in 25 mg increments until pain was satisfactorily relieved. Group 2 received increments of intravenous pethidine alone. The primary endpoint was total pethidine dose required to achieve analgesia to the patient's satisfaction. No significant difference in total pethidine dose between the groups was found. It was concluded that administration of rectal indomethacin does not reduce the total dose of intravenous pethidine required to relieve the pain of acute renal colic.
本研究的目的是比较两组急性肾绞痛患者达到满意镇痛效果所需静脉注射哌替啶的总剂量,其中一组在就诊时还给予直肠吲哚美辛,另一组未给予。这是一项前瞻性、随机、非盲对照研究。每组包含39名患者。第1组接受直肠吲哚美辛100mg,并以25mg的增量静脉注射哌替啶,直至疼痛得到满意缓解。第2组仅接受静脉注射哌替啶增量。主要终点是达到患者满意镇痛效果所需的哌替啶总剂量。两组之间的哌替啶总剂量未发现显著差异。得出的结论是,直肠给予吲哚美辛并不能减少缓解急性肾绞痛疼痛所需的静脉注射哌替啶的总剂量。