• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肌肉注射双氯芬酸与静脉注射吲哚美辛治疗急性肾绞痛的比较。

Intramuscular diclofenac versus intravenous indomethacin in the treatment of acute renal colic.

作者信息

Laerum E, Ommundsen O E, Grønseth J E, Christiansen A, Fagertun H E

机构信息

Department of General Practice, University of Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Eur Urol. 1996;30(3):358-62. doi: 10.1159/000474196.

DOI:10.1159/000474196
PMID:8931970
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We have conducted a clinical trial to compare the pain-relieving effect and safety of diclofenac administered intramuscularly to indomethacin given intravenously.

METHODS

The study was designed as a randomized single-blind trial. It was carried out at Oslo Emergency Hospital (outpatient setting or stay < 24 h). 41 patients with a mean age of 41.6 years received 75 mg diclofenac and 42 patients with a mean age of 45.2 years were given 50 mg indomethacin. The two groups were similar in regard to baseline characteristics except gender distribution.

RESULTS

Statistically significant reduction in pain intensity was achieved after 5 min in the diclofenac group (p < 0.01), and after 10 min in the indomethacin group (p < 0.01). The probability of having pain after 1 h was 52% in the indomethacin group and 37% in the diclofenac group (p = 0.11). Rescue medication with pethidine after 2 h was given in 9 and 5 patients, respectively. Four patients in the diclofenac group reported one occurrence of adverse effect each, while 9 patients on indomethacin experienced 14 occurrences, mainly dizziness and nausea.

CONCLUSION

These findings together with a simpler mode of administration indicate that diclofenac may be preferred in the analgesic treatment of renal colic.

摘要

目的

我们进行了一项临床试验,以比较肌肉注射双氯芬酸与静脉注射吲哚美辛的止痛效果和安全性。

方法

该研究设计为随机单盲试验。在奥斯陆急诊医院(门诊环境或住院时间<24小时)进行。41名平均年龄为41.6岁的患者接受了75毫克双氯芬酸,42名平均年龄为45.2岁的患者接受了50毫克吲哚美辛。除性别分布外,两组在基线特征方面相似。

结果

双氯芬酸组在5分钟后疼痛强度有统计学意义的降低(p<0.01),吲哚美辛组在10分钟后疼痛强度有统计学意义的降低(p<0.01)。1小时后仍有疼痛的概率在吲哚美辛组为52%,在双氯芬酸组为37%(p = 0.11)。2小时后分别有9名和5名患者使用哌替啶进行解救用药。双氯芬酸组有4名患者各报告发生1次不良反应,而吲哚美辛组有9名患者发生14次不良反应,主要是头晕和恶心。

结论

这些发现以及更简单的给药方式表明,在肾绞痛的止痛治疗中双氯芬酸可能更受青睐。

相似文献

1
Intramuscular diclofenac versus intravenous indomethacin in the treatment of acute renal colic.肌肉注射双氯芬酸与静脉注射吲哚美辛治疗急性肾绞痛的比较。
Eur Urol. 1996;30(3):358-62. doi: 10.1159/000474196.
2
Administration of rectal indomethacin does not reduce the requirement for intravenous narcotic analgesia in acute renal colic.直肠给予吲哚美辛并不能降低急性肾绞痛患者对静脉注射麻醉性镇痛药的需求。
Eur J Emerg Med. 1996 Jun;3(2):92-4. doi: 10.1097/00063110-199606000-00006.
3
Intramuscular piroxicam versus intramuscular diclofenac sodium in the treatment of acute renal colic: double-blind study.肌肉注射吡罗昔康与肌肉注射双氯芬酸钠治疗急性肾绞痛的双盲研究。
Eur J Med Res. 1999 Jan 26;4(1):23-6.
4
Comparative study of the efficacy of dipyrone, diclofenac sodium and pethidine in acute renal colic. Collaborative Group of the Spanish Society of Clinical Pharmacology.安乃近、双氯芬酸钠与哌替啶治疗急性肾绞痛疗效的比较研究。西班牙临床药理学会协作组
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1991;40(6):543-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00279966.
5
A multi-centre comparative study of diclofenac sodium and a dipyrone/spasmolytic combination, and a single-centre comparative study of diclofenac sodium and pethidine in renal colic patients in India.印度肾绞痛患者中双氯芬酸钠与安乃近/解痉药组合的多中心比较研究,以及双氯芬酸钠与哌替啶的单中心比较研究。
Curr Med Res Opin. 1991;12(6):366-73. doi: 10.1185/03007999109111506.
6
Treatment of renal colic by prostaglandin synthetase inhibitors and avafortan (analgesic antispasmodic).用前列腺素合成酶抑制剂和阿伐福坦(止痛解痉剂)治疗肾绞痛。
Br J Urol. 1990 Dec;66(6):602-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1990.tb07190.x.
7
Comparative study of the efficacy of lysine acetylsalicylate, indomethacin and pethidine in acute renal colic.赖氨酸阿司匹林、吲哚美辛和哌替啶治疗急性肾绞痛疗效的比较研究
Eur J Emerg Med. 1996 Sep;3(3):183-6. doi: 10.1097/00063110-199609000-00008.
8
Managing acute renal colic. Intramuscular diclofenac should be avoided.处理急性肾绞痛。应避免使用双氯芬酸肌肉注射剂。
BMJ. 2003 Mar 1;326(7387):502. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7387.502.
9
A double-blind, placebo controlled comparison of the morphine sparing effect of oral rofecoxib and diclofenac for acute renal colic.口服罗非昔布和双氯芬酸对急性肾绞痛吗啡节约效应的双盲、安慰剂对照比较。
J Urol. 2005 Sep;174(3):933-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000169483.47777.7e.
10
Oral diclofenac in the prophylactic treatment of recurrent renal colic. A double-blind comparison with placebo.口服双氯芬酸预防复发性肾绞痛。与安慰剂的双盲对照研究。
Eur Urol. 1995;28(2):108-11. doi: 10.1159/000475031.

引用本文的文献

1
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for acute renal colic.用于急性肾绞痛的非甾体抗炎药
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 14;3(3):CD006027. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006027.pub3.
2
Methodology and findings of randomized clinical trials on pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic interventions to treat renal colic pain - a review.治疗肾绞痛的药物和非药物干预措施的随机临床试验方法与结果——综述
Cent European J Urol. 2023;76(3):212-226. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2023.92. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
3
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and non-opioids for acute renal colic.
非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)和非阿片类药物用于急性肾绞痛。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 29;2015(6):CD006027. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006027.pub2.
4
Intramuscular Etofenamate versus Diclofenac in the Relief of Renal Colic : A Randomised, Single-Blind, Comparative Study.肌肉内依托芬那酯与双氯芬酸治疗肾绞痛的缓解效果比较:一项随机、单盲、对照研究。
Clin Drug Investig. 2003;23(11):701-6. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200323110-00002.