Nissen I, Birke H, Olsen J B, Würtz E, Lorentzen K, Salomon H, Lynge P, Fly P, Jørgensen T H, Svane S
Department of Surgery, Thisted Hospital, Gentofte, Denmark.
Br J Urol. 1990 Jun;65(6):576-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1990.tb14823.x.
A randomised multicentre clinical trial was undertaken to compare the effect on pain of indomethacin administered either intravenously or rectally to 116 patients with ureteric colic. Adverse reactions were also assessed. Of the patients receiving the intravenous injection, 48/53 (91%) achieved good pain relief (i.e. no supplementary analgesia was required) 30 min after administration, compared with 46/63 (73%) receiving the enema. Significantly more side effects occurred in the group treated intravenously. It was concluded that indomethacin administered as an enema was less effective than the intravenous form, but it should be regarded as a good alternative in the treatment of ureteric colic.
开展了一项随机多中心临床试验,以比较静脉注射或直肠给药吲哚美辛对116例输尿管绞痛患者疼痛的影响。同时也评估了不良反应。静脉注射组中,48/53(91%)的患者在给药30分钟后疼痛得到有效缓解(即无需补充镇痛剂),相比之下,接受灌肠的患者中这一比例为46/63(73%)。静脉注射组出现的副作用明显更多。得出的结论是,吲哚美辛灌肠给药的效果不如静脉注射,但在输尿管绞痛的治疗中应被视为一种不错的替代方法。