Suppr超能文献

艾滋病时代的性协商:重新审视协商性安全

Sexual negotiation in the AIDS era: negotiated safety revisited.

作者信息

Kippax S, Noble J, Prestage G, Crawford J M, Campbell D, Baxter D, Cooper D

机构信息

National Centre in HIV Social Research, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

AIDS. 1997 Feb;11(2):191-7. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199702000-00009.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To test the safety of the 'negotiated safety' strategy-the strategy of dispensing with condoms within HIV-seronegative concordant regular sexual relationships under certain conditions.

METHOD

Data from recently recruited cohort of homosexually active men (Sydney Men and Sexual Health cohort, n = 1037) are used to revisit negotiated safety. The men were surveyed using a structured questionnaire and questions addressing their sexual relationships and practice their own and their regular partner's serostatus, agreements entered into by the men concerning sexual practice within and outside their regular relationship, and contextual and demographic variables.

RESULTS

The findings indicate that a significant number of men used negotiated safety as an HIV prevention strategy. In the 6 months prior to interview, of the 181 men in seroconcordant HIV-negative regular relationships, 62% had engaged in unprotected anal intercourse within their relationship, and 91% (165 men) had not engaged in unprotected anal intercourse outside their relationship. Of these 165 men, 82% had negotiated agreements about sex outside their relationship. The safety of negotiation was dependent not only on seroconcordance but also on the presence of an agreement; 82% of the men who had not engaged in unprotected anal intercourse outside their regular relationship had entered into an agreement with their partner, whereas only 56% of those who had engaged in unprotected anal intercourse had an agreement. The safety of negotiation was also related to the nature of the safety agreement reached between the men and on the acceptability of condoms. Agreements between HIV-negative seroconcordant regular partners prohibiting anal intercourse with casual partners or any form of sex with a casual partner were typically complied with, and men who had such negotiated agreements were at low risk of HIV infection.

CONCLUSIONS

The adoption of the strategy of negotiated safety among men in HIV-seronegative regular relationships may help such men sustain the safety of their sexual practice.

摘要

目的

检验“协商安全”策略的安全性——即在特定条件下,在血清学阴性的固定同性性关系中不使用避孕套的策略。

方法

利用最近招募的性活跃男性队列(悉尼男性与性健康队列,n = 1037)的数据重新审视协商安全。使用结构化问卷对这些男性进行调查,问题涉及他们的性关系、自身及固定伴侣的血清学状态、他们就固定关系内外的性行为达成的协议,以及背景和人口统计学变量。

结果

研究结果表明,相当数量的男性将协商安全作为一种预防艾滋病病毒的策略。在访谈前的6个月里,在181对血清学均为阴性的固定同性关系男性中,62%在其关系内进行了无保护肛交,91%(165名男性)在其关系外未进行无保护肛交。在这165名男性中,82%就关系外的性行为达成了协议。协商的安全性不仅取决于血清学一致性,还取决于协议的存在;在其固定关系外未进行无保护肛交的男性中,82%与伴侣达成了协议,而在进行了无保护肛交的男性中,只有56%有协议。协商的安全性还与男性之间达成的安全协议的性质以及避孕套的可接受性有关。血清学阴性的固定同性伴侣之间禁止与临时伴侣进行肛交或与临时伴侣进行任何形式性行为的协议通常会得到遵守,有此类协商协议的男性感染艾滋病病毒的风险较低。

结论

在血清学阴性的固定同性关系男性中采用协商安全策略可能有助于这些男性维持其性行为的安全性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验