Suppr超能文献

既往使用非甾体抗炎药和抗凝剂:对出血性胃十二指肠溃疡临床结局的影响。

Previous use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and anticoagulants: the influence on clinical outcome of bleeding gastroduodenal ulcers.

作者信息

Vreeburg E M, de Bruijne H W, Snel P, Bartelsman J W, Rauws E A, Tytgat G N

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1997 Jan;9(1):41-4. doi: 10.1097/00042737-199701000-00011.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the relationship between prior non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) or anticoagulant use and clinical outcome in bleeding gastric and duodenal ulcer patients.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort-study.

PARTICIPANTS

All patients (n = 132) admitted because of upper gastrointestinal bleeding during 3 months in the Amsterdam area.

METHODS

We compared clinical outcome (blood transfusion, rebleeding, surgery and mortality) between ulcer patients who used NSAIDs or anticoagulants and patients who did not use these drugs before the bleeding-episode.

RESULTS

Of the 132 patients admitted, 56 patients had gastric or duodenal ulcers. NSAIDs were used significantly more often before the bleeding episode in these ulcer patients than in the non-ulcer patients (n = 76), 21/56 (37.5%) vs. 15/76 (19.7%), respectively (P < 0.05), relative risk = 2.57, 95% confidence interval: 1.04-5.77). Stigmata of recent haemorrhage were found in 16/21 (76.2%) patients in the NSAID ulcer group, in 2/9 (22.2%) in the coumarin-ulcer patients, and in 12/24 (50%) in the no-medication ulcer group (not significant). Prior NSAID usage increased the in-hospital rebleeding rate from 16.7% to 42.9% (P = 0.05), leading to an increased need for surgical intervention from 16.7% to 42.9% (P = 0.05). In contrast prior usage of anticoagulants, which could be antagonized, did not affect the clinical outcome of the bleeding. Mortality was 9.5% in the NSAID group, 0% in the coumarin group, and 4.2% in the no-medication group.

CONCLUSION

Prior use of NSAIDs increases the risk of rebleeding in bleeding ulcer patients, and leads to a higher need for urgent surgery. In contrast, prior anticoagulant therapy does not raise the rebleeding risk.

摘要

目的

评估既往使用非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)或抗凝剂与胃和十二指肠溃疡出血患者临床结局之间的关系。

设计

前瞻性队列研究。

参与者

阿姆斯特丹地区3个月内因上消化道出血入院的所有患者(n = 132)。

方法

我们比较了在出血事件发生前使用NSAIDs或抗凝剂的溃疡患者与未使用这些药物的患者的临床结局(输血、再出血、手术和死亡率)。

结果

在132例入院患者中,56例患有胃或十二指肠溃疡。这些溃疡患者在出血事件发生前使用NSAIDs的频率明显高于非溃疡患者(n = 76),分别为21/56(37.5%)和15/76(19.7%)(P < 0.05),相对风险 = 2.57,95%置信区间:1.04 - 5.77)。在NSAID溃疡组的16/21(76.2%)患者、香豆素溃疡组的2/9(22.2%)患者和未用药溃疡组的12/24(50%)患者中发现近期出血迹象(无显著性差异)。既往使用NSAIDs使院内再出血率从16.7%增至42.9%(P = 0.05),导致手术干预需求从16.7%增至42.9%(P = 0.05)。相比之下,可被拮抗的既往抗凝剂使用并未影响出血的临床结局。NSAID组死亡率为9.5%,香豆素组为0%,未用药组为4.2%。

结论

既往使用NSAIDs会增加溃疡出血患者再出血的风险,并导致更高的紧急手术需求。相比之下,既往抗凝治疗不会增加再出血风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验