Yuen E J, Zisselman M H, Louis D Z, Rovner B W
Center for Research in Medical Education and Health Care, Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, PA 19107-5083, USA.
J Ment Health Adm. 1997 Winter;24(1):90-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02790484.
Sedative-hypnotic medications are often used to treat anxiety and sleep disorders, although they may not be used appropriately. Relationships between hospital length of stay (LOS), costs, and levels of sedative-hypnotic use were examined. Charts of 856 elderly patients were reviewed for sedative hypnotic use and categorized into three groups: those whose use exceeded Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) guidelines, those who used sedative-hypnotic medications but did not exceed HCFA guidelines, and those who did not receive any sedative-hypnotic medications. Patients whose sedative-hypnotic use exceeded guidelines had longer LOS (21.5 exceeding guidelines vs. 12.3 within guidelines vs. 6.7 no use, p < or = .001) and higher costs ($29,245 exceeding guidelines vs. $15,219 within guidelines vs. $7,516 no use, p < = or .001.) Even after controlling for severity of illness and comorbid conditions, differences in LOS and costs persisted. This study indicates that sedative-hypnotic medications are frequently prescribed to elderly patients, often in doses exceeding proposed guidelines, and are associated with longer hospital stays and higher hospital costs.
镇静催眠药物常用于治疗焦虑和睡眠障碍,尽管其使用可能并不恰当。研究了住院时间(LOS)、费用与镇静催眠药物使用水平之间的关系。对856名老年患者的病历进行回顾,以了解镇静催眠药物的使用情况,并将其分为三组:使用量超过医疗保健财务管理局(HCFA)指南的患者、使用镇静催眠药物但未超过HCFA指南的患者以及未接受任何镇静催眠药物的患者。镇静催眠药物使用量超过指南的患者住院时间更长(超过指南者为21.5天,在指南范围内者为12.3天,未使用者为6.7天,p≤0.001),费用更高(超过指南者为29245美元,在指南范围内者为15219美元,未使用者为7516美元,p≤0.001)。即使在控制了疾病严重程度和合并症之后,住院时间和费用的差异仍然存在。这项研究表明,镇静催眠药物经常被开给老年患者,剂量常常超过建议的指南,并且与更长的住院时间和更高的住院费用相关。