Brandeis G H, Baumann M M, Hossain M, Morris J N, Resnick N M
Hebrew Rehabilitation Center for Aged, Boston, MA, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997 Feb;45(2):179-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb04504.x.
To use the Minimum Data Set (MDS) to describe the frequency and correlates of potentially treatable causes of urinary incontinence among a representative sample of American nursing home residents. To describe current management practices of urinary incontinence in the same population.
Cross-sectional study using the dataset that was part of the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) evaluation of the MDS.
270 Medicaid-certified nursing homes in 10 states.
A total of 2014 nursing home residents 60 years or older (mean = 84.3 +/- 8.7), 75.5% women, 81.9% white, who lived in a nursing home during the fall of 1990 were randomly selected to sample a fixed number of residents for each facility based on facility size.
Incontinence was defined as the presence of at least two episodes of urinary leakage per week in the previous 2 weeks. Management techniques (toileting, pads/briefs, catheters) were those listed in the MDS. Potentially remediable causes of urinary incontinence available in the MDS were: medications (antipsychotics, antidepressants, and antianxiety/hypnotics); congestive heart failure; diabetes mellitus; pedal edema; delirium; depression; and impairments in activities of daily living (ADLs) (transferring, locomotion, dressing, toileting; bedrails; trunk restraints; and chair restraints).
Forty-nine percent of residents were incontinent. Of these, 84.0% were managed by pads/briefs, 38.7% by scheduled toileting, 3.5% by indwelling catheter, and 1.2% by external catheter. Of the potentially reversible causes, bivariate analysis revealed associations (P < .1) with use of antidepressants, antipsychotics, and antianxiety/hypnotics; delirium; bedrails; trunk restraints; chair restraints; and ADL impairment. Dementia was also associated with incontinence (P < .1). Multivariate analysis revealed that urinary incontinence was independently associated with impairment in ADLs (OR = 4.2; CI = 3.2,5.6), dementia (OR = 2.3;CI = 1.8,3.0), restraints-trunk (OR = 1.7; CI = 1.5,2.0), chair (OR = 1.4; CI = 1.2,1.6), bedrails (OR = 1.3; CI = 1.1,1.5), and use of antianxiety/hypnotic medications (OR = .7;CI = .5,1.0) (all P < .04).
Current management practices for urinary incontinence are inconsistent with advocated guidelines. These data also confirm the association between incontinence and several potentially remediable conditions and suggest that, even in the nursing home setting, urinary incontinence may respond to efforts to improve conditions not directly related to bladder function. This study underscores the need to examine the impact on urinary incontinence of strategies to address such conditions.
使用最小数据集(MDS)来描述美国疗养院居民代表性样本中尿失禁潜在可治疗病因的频率及相关因素。描述同一人群中尿失禁的当前管理做法。
采用作为医疗保健财务管理局(HCFA)对MDS评估一部分的数据集进行横断面研究。
10个州的270家医疗补助认证疗养院。
共2014名60岁及以上的疗养院居民(平均年龄 = 84.3 ± 8.7岁),75.5%为女性,81.9%为白人,他们于1990年秋季居住在疗养院,根据疗养院规模为每个机构随机抽取固定数量的居民。
尿失禁定义为前两周内每周至少有两次漏尿情况。管理技术(如厕、尿垫/内裤、导尿管)为MDS中列出的那些。MDS中可用的尿失禁潜在可纠正病因包括:药物(抗精神病药、抗抑郁药和抗焦虑/催眠药);充血性心力衰竭;糖尿病;足部水肿;谵妄;抑郁;以及日常生活活动(ADL)障碍(转移、移动、穿衣、如厕;床栏;躯干约束;和椅子约束)。
49%的居民存在尿失禁。其中,84.0%通过尿垫/内裤管理,38.7%通过定时如厕管理,3.5%通过留置导尿管管理,1.2%通过外置导尿管管理。在潜在可逆病因中,双变量分析显示与使用抗抑郁药、抗精神病药和抗焦虑/催眠药;谵妄;床栏;躯干约束;椅子约束;以及ADL障碍存在关联(P < 0.1)。痴呆也与尿失禁有关(P < 0.1)。多变量分析显示,尿失禁与ADL障碍(OR = 4.2;CI = 3.2,5.6)、痴呆(OR = 2.3;CI = 1.8,3.0)、躯干约束(OR = 1.7;CI = 1.5,2.0)、椅子约束(OR = 1.4;CI = 1.2,1.6)、床栏(OR = 1.3;CI = 1.1,1.5)以及使用抗焦虑/催眠药物(OR = 0.7;CI = 0.5,1.0)独立相关(所有P < 0.04)。
尿失禁的当前管理做法与倡导的指南不一致。这些数据还证实了尿失禁与几种潜在可纠正状况之间的关联,并表明即使在疗养院环境中,尿失禁可能会因改善与膀胱功能无直接关系的状况的努力而得到改善。本研究强调需要研究解决此类状况的策略对尿失禁的影响。