• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

贫困市中心高血压患者血压控制的相关因素

Correlates of controlled hypertension in indigent, inner-city hypertensive patients.

作者信息

Ahluwalia J S, McNagny S E, Rask K J

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 1997 Jan;12(1):7-14. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.12107.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.12107.x
PMID:9034941
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1497056/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify correlates of controlled hypertension in a largely minority population of treated hypertensive patients.

DESIGN

Case-control study.

SETTING

Urban, public hospital.

PATIENTS

A consecutive sample of patients who were aware of their diagnosis of hypertension for at least 1 month and had previously filled an antihypertensive prescription. Control patients had a systolic blood pressure (SBP) < or = 140 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) < or = 90 mm Hg, and case patients had a SBP > or = 180 mm Hg or DBP > or = 110 mm Hg.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Control subjects had a mean blood pressure (BP) of 130/80 mm Hg and case subjects had a mean BP of 193/106 mm Hg. Baseline demographic characteristics between the 88 case and the 133 control subjects were not significantly different. In a logistic regression model, after adjusting for age, gender, race, education, owning a telephone, and family income, controlled hypertension was associated with having a regular source of care (odds ratio [OR] 7.93; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.86, 16.29), having been to a doctor in the previous 6 months (OR 4.81; 1.14, 20.31), reporting that cost was not a deterrent to buying their antihypertensive medication (OR 3.63; 1.59, 8.28), and having insurance (OR 2.15; 1.02, 4.52). Being compliant with antihypertensive medication regimens was of borderline significance (OR 1.96; 0.99, 3.88). A secondary analysis found that patients with Medicaid coverage were significantly less likely than the uninsured to report cost as a barrier to purchasing antihypertensive medications and seeing a physician.

CONCLUSIONS

The absence of out-of-pocket expenditures under Medicaid for medications and physician care may contribute significantly to BP control. Improved access to a regular source of care and increased sensitivity to medication costs for all patients may lead to improved BP control in an indigent, inner-city population.

摘要

目的

在以少数族裔为主的接受治疗的高血压患者群体中确定血压得到控制的相关因素。

设计

病例对照研究。

地点

城市公立医院。

患者

连续选取的知晓自己患有高血压至少1个月且此前已开具过抗高血压处方的患者样本。对照患者的收缩压(SBP)≤140 mmHg且舒张压(DBP)≤90 mmHg,病例患者的SBP≥180 mmHg或DBP≥110 mmHg。

测量指标及主要结果

对照受试者的平均血压(BP)为130/80 mmHg,病例受试者的平均BP为193/106 mmHg。88例病例受试者与133例对照受试者的基线人口统计学特征无显著差异。在逻辑回归模型中,在调整年龄、性别、种族、教育程度、是否拥有电话和家庭收入后,血压得到控制与有固定的医疗保健来源(比值比[OR] 7.93;95%置信区间[CI] 3.86,16.29)、在过去六个月内看过医生(OR 4.81;1.14,20.31)、表示费用不是购买抗高血压药物的阻碍(OR 3.63;1.59,8.28)以及拥有保险(OR 2.15;1.02,4.52)相关。遵行抗高血压药物治疗方案具有临界显著性(OR 1.96;0.99,3.88)。一项二次分析发现,有医疗补助覆盖的患者比未参保患者报告费用是购买抗高血压药物和看医生障碍的可能性显著更低。

结论

医疗补助计划下药物和医生诊疗无需自付费用可能对血压控制有显著贡献。改善所有患者获得固定医疗保健来源的机会并提高对药物费用的敏感度可能会使贫困的市中心城区人群的血压控制情况得到改善。

相似文献

1
Correlates of controlled hypertension in indigent, inner-city hypertensive patients.贫困市中心高血压患者血压控制的相关因素
J Gen Intern Med. 1997 Jan;12(1):7-14. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.12107.x.
2
A telecommunications system for monitoring and counseling patients with hypertension. Impact on medication adherence and blood pressure control.一种用于监测和辅导高血压患者的电信系统。对药物依从性和血压控制的影响。
Am J Hypertens. 1996 Apr;9(4 Pt 1):285-92. doi: 10.1016/0895-7061(95)00353-3.
3
Effectiveness of valsartan for treatment of hypertension: patient profiling and hierarchical modeling of determinants and outcomes (the PREVIEW study).缬沙坦治疗高血压的有效性:患者特征分析及决定因素与结局的分层建模(PREVIEW研究)
Ann Pharmacother. 2009 May;43(5):849-61. doi: 10.1345/aph.1L576. Epub 2009 Apr 7.
4
Antihypertensive treatment based on blood pressure measurement at home or in the physician's office: a randomized controlled trial.基于家庭或医生办公室血压测量的降压治疗:一项随机对照试验。
JAMA. 2004 Feb 25;291(8):955-64. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.8.955.
5
Health insurance status and hypertension monitoring and control in the United States.美国的医疗保险状况与高血压监测及控制
Am J Hypertens. 2007 Apr;20(4):348-53. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2006.11.007.
6
Impact of poorly controlled hypertension on healthcare resource utilization and cost.血压控制不佳的高血压对医疗资源利用和成本的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2001 Apr;7(4):389-98.
7
[Arterial hypertension difficult to control in the elderly patient. The significance of the "white coat effect"].老年患者中难以控制的动脉高血压。“白大衣效应”的意义
Rev Port Cardiol. 1999 Oct;18(10):897-906.
8
Comparison of fixed-dose combinations of telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide 40/12.5 mg and 80/12.5 mg and a fixed-dose combination of losartan/hydrochlorothiazide 50/12.5 mg in mild to moderate essential hypertension: pooled analysis of two multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-end point (PROBE) trials.替米沙坦/氢氯噻嗪40/12.5毫克和80/12.5毫克固定剂量组合与氯沙坦/氢氯噻嗪50/12.5毫克固定剂量组合治疗轻度至中度原发性高血压的比较:两项多中心、前瞻性、随机、开放标签、盲终点(PROBE)试验的汇总分析
Clin Ther. 2005 Nov;27(11):1795-805. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.11.014.
9
Awareness and control of hypertension in Bangladesh: follow-up of a hypertensive cohort.孟加拉国高血压的知晓与控制:高血压队列随访
BMJ Open. 2014 Dec 23;4(12):e004983. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004983.
10
US trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension, 1988-2008.美国高血压的患病率、知晓率、治疗率和控制率趋势,1988-2008 年。
JAMA. 2010 May 26;303(20):2043-50. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.650.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of local health insurance schemes on primary care management and control of hypertension: a cross-sectional study in Shenzhen, China.地方医疗保险计划对原发性高血压管理与控制的影响:一项在中国深圳开展的横断面研究
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 18;9(10):e031098. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031098.
2
Polypill for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in an Underserved Population.用于服务不足人群心血管疾病预防的复方药。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Sep 19;381(12):1114-1123. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1815359.
3
Factors Associated With Loss of Usual Source of Care Among Older Adults.老年人通常的医疗服务提供者发生变化的相关因素。
Ann Fam Med. 2018 Nov;16(6):538-545. doi: 10.1370/afm.2283.
4
To what extent do prescribing practices for hypertension in the private sector in Zimbabwe follow the national treatment guidelines? An analysis of insurance medical claims.津巴布韦私营部门的高血压处方做法在多大程度上遵循国家治疗指南?一项保险医疗索赔分析。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2017 Dec 4;10:37. doi: 10.1186/s40545-017-0125-7. eCollection 2017.
5
Hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control, in male South Asian immigrants in the United Arab Emirates: a cross-sectional study.阿拉伯联合酋长国男性南亚移民的高血压患病率、知晓率、治疗率和控制率:一项横断面研究。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2015 May 7;15:30. doi: 10.1186/s12872-015-0024-2.
6
Self-blood pressure monitoring in an urban, ethnically diverse population: a randomized clinical trial utilizing the electronic health record.城市多民族人群的自我血压监测:一项利用电子健康记录的随机临床试验。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015 Mar;8(2):138-45. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.000950. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
7
Differences and similarities in explanatory models of hypertension in the United States of america, Tanzania and Jamaica.美国、坦桑尼亚和牙买加高血压解释模型的异同
West Indian Med J. 2014 Jun;63(3):238-46. doi: 10.7727/wimj.2013.302. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
8
The growing gap in hypertension control between insured and uninsured adults: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1988 to 2010.参保与未参保成年人高血压控制差距日益增大:1988 年至 2010 年全国健康与营养调查。
Hypertension. 2014 Nov;64(5):997-1004. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.04276. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
9
Racial disparities in hypertension awareness and management: are there differences among African Americans and Whites living under similar social conditions?高血压知晓率和管理方面的种族差异:生活在相似社会条件下的非裔美国人和白人之间存在差异吗?
Ethn Dis. 2014 Summer;24(3):269-75.
10
Closing the gap in hypertension control between younger and older adults: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1988 to 2010.缩小年轻和老年人群高血压控制差距:1988 年至 2010 年全国健康和营养调查(NHANES)。
Circulation. 2014 May 20;129(20):2052-61. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.007699. Epub 2014 Apr 14.