Suppr超能文献

[眩晕与焦虑症——多学科评估结果]

[Vertigo and anxiety disorders--results of interdisciplinary evaluation].

作者信息

Eckhardt A, Tettenborn B, Krauthauser H, Thomalske C, Hartmann O, Hoffmann S O, Hopf H C

机构信息

Universitätsklinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie Mainz.

出版信息

Laryngorhinootologie. 1996 Sep;75(9):517-22. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-997625.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Vertigo is a common symptom that often remains unexplained despite extensive medical evaluation. Psychiatric and psychosomatic disorders are usually considered after all somatic causes of vertigo have been ruled out.

METHODS

Eighty-three patients referred to neurological or psychosomatic outpatient treatment received an extensive neurootologic and psychosomatic evaluation: one (or two) diagnostic psychiatric psychodynamic exploration(s), a structured interview, psychometric tests (SCL-90-R, STAI-G X2 and GBB). The patients were divided into four diagnostic groups: psychic causes only (psychogenic group), neurootologic causes only (somatic group), both diagnoses (psychosomatic group), neither diagnosis (group IV).

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients had organic vertigo, thirty-nine patients had psychogenic vertigo and in seventeen cases a vestibular lesion initiated the development of a neurotic disorder, particular anxiety disorder. Most of the patients of the psychogenic and psychosomatic group had anxiety or phobic disorders. The patients with psychogenic or psychosomatic symptoms of vertigo generally report a higher level of subjective distress; the periods of disability are significant longer.

CONCLUSIONS

The study suggests that assessment of psychiatric and psychosomatic symptoms should always accompany, not follow, neurootologic evaluation of vertigo. An early interdisciplinary therapy should be started to prevent the chronicity of the symptomatology.

摘要

背景

眩晕是一种常见症状,尽管经过广泛的医学评估,通常仍无法解释其病因。在排除所有眩晕的躯体原因后,通常会考虑精神和心身疾病。

方法

83例转诊至神经科或心身门诊治疗的患者接受了广泛的神经耳科和心身评估:一次(或两次)诊断性精神心理动力学探索、一次结构化访谈、心理测量测试(SCL-90-R、STAI-G X2和GBB)。患者被分为四个诊断组:仅精神原因(心因性组)、仅神经耳科原因(躯体组)、两种诊断均有(心身组)、两种诊断均无(第四组)。

结果

23例患者患有器质性眩晕,39例患者患有心因性眩晕,17例患者因前庭病变引发神经症,尤其是焦虑症。心因性和心身组的大多数患者患有焦虑或恐惧症。有心因性或心身性眩晕症状的患者通常报告主观痛苦程度较高;残疾期明显更长。

结论

该研究表明,对眩晕进行神经耳科评估时,应始终同时评估精神和心身症状,而不是在其后进行。应尽早开始跨学科治疗,以防止症状慢性化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验