Klosinski G, Karle M
Abteilung für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie im Kindes- und Jugendalter, Tübingen.
Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr. 1996 Nov;45(9):331-8.
In a retrospective analysis 30 expert opinions on the right of visitation, which recommend the exclusion of this right for the non-custodial parent, are evaluated. These cases represent 23% of the expert opinions concerning the right of visitation that have been given by the department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry of the University of Tübingen between 1991 and 1994. Focusing on the decisive argument for the expert to exclude the right of visitation, it became apparent that in 40% of the cases the will of the child was the determining factor, followed by sustained tension between the parents in 33% of the cases. Emotional neglect, (continuous) abuse and maltreatment (12%) as well as offences against the clause of good behaviour (Wohlverhaltensklausel) were of significant smaller influence on the decision. And although 61% of the children have been classified as psychological disturbed, only in 5% of the cases this diagnosis was of importance.
在一项回顾性分析中,对30份关于探视权的专家意见进行了评估,这些意见建议剥夺非监护方的探视权。这些案例占图宾根大学儿童与青少年精神病学系在1991年至1994年间给出的有关探视权专家意见的23%。聚焦于专家剥夺探视权的决定性论据,很明显在40%的案例中孩子的意愿是决定性因素,其次在33%的案例中是父母之间持续的紧张关系。情感忽视、(持续性)虐待和 maltreatment(12%)以及违反行为良好条款的行为对该决定的影响要小得多。尽管61%的孩子被归类为心理障碍,但只有5%的案例中这一诊断具有重要性。 (注:maltreatment 未找到完全对应中文,这里保留英文)