Feltquate D M, Heaney S, Webster R G, Robinson H L
Department of Pathology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester 01655, USA.
J Immunol. 1997 Mar 1;158(5):2278-84.
Several routes and methods of DNA immunization have been shown to generate Ab, Th cells, and CTL responses. However, few studies have directly compared the immune responses generated by different routes and methods of DNA immunization. Utilizing an influenza hemagglutinin (H1)-expressing plasmid, we compared the immune response produced by saline injection of DNA into skin or muscle, and gene gun immunization of skin or muscle. We found that saline-DNA immunization raised a predominantly Th1 response with mostly IgG2a anti-H1 Ab, while gene gun DNA immunization produced a predominantly Th2 response with mostly IgG1 anti-H1 Abs. These distinct types of immune responses were generated by the method, not the route, of DNA immunization. The initial immunization established the Th cell-type of the immune response. The Th cell-type did not change with further DNA immunizations by the same or the alternate method, or after a viral challenge. The ability to generate different Th types was not due to differences in the doses of DNA used in saline and gene gun DNA immunization. These findings have important implications for vaccine design and studies of the mechanism of Th cell differentiation.
几种DNA免疫的途径和方法已被证明能产生抗体、Th细胞和CTL反应。然而,很少有研究直接比较不同DNA免疫途径和方法所产生的免疫反应。利用表达流感血凝素(H1)的质粒,我们比较了将DNA盐水注射到皮肤或肌肉以及用基因枪免疫皮肤或肌肉所产生的免疫反应。我们发现,盐水-DNA免疫主要引发Th1反应,产生的大多是IgG2a抗H1抗体,而基因枪DNA免疫主要产生Th2反应,产生的大多是IgG1抗H1抗体。这些不同类型的免疫反应是由DNA免疫的方法而非途径产生的。初次免疫确立了免疫反应的Th细胞类型。Th细胞类型不会因用相同或替代方法进行进一步的DNA免疫而改变,也不会因病毒攻击而改变。产生不同Th类型的能力并非由于盐水注射和基因枪DNA免疫中所用DNA剂量的差异。这些发现对疫苗设计和Th细胞分化机制的研究具有重要意义。